The effect of Taiwan’s high housing prices to cash-strapped families is bordering on violating the basic human rights as guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in which, according to Article 25, “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services.”
High housing prices pose a threat to housing rights, but capping rising prices is not necessarily the solution.
It is necessary to make sure that the effects of redistributive justice are felt by those it is aimed at helping, alleviating the problem of excessive housing expenditure through the government support system for those in need.
The rapid rise in housing prices means that rents would also rise. Taiwan’s gross rental yield is only about 2.5 percent, which has fallen to rock bottom, and it is only a matter of time before rents rise.
Households around Taiwan are struggling to make ends meet after basic living expenses have been accounted for. Benefiting from Taiwan’s health insurance system, plentiful commodities, food and medical care might ease the burden, but many people find transportation and education costs unaffordable.
Those who aspire to live in nicer accommodation are often consigned to long commutes, spending two or three hours every day on crowded public transport. Proximity to the workplace often means having to pay a premium on rent, with a considerable drop in quality of living conditions.
Shortcuts are often made when it comes to expenditure on education. UK and South Korean studies have found that high-housing expenditure correlates with less spending on educational resources, reducing the ability to secure a high salary and thereby leading to the cycle of poverty.
When housing prices are so high that the basic well-being of the housing disadvantaged cannot be maintained, one option might be to cap rising housing prices.
However, the issue is that given the current banking system spends more than NT$13 trillion (US$406.58 billion) on housing loans and construction financing, if we really want to make housing prices reasonably affordable and greatly reduce housing prices, the construction and financial industries that lend a lot of real estate loans would be the first to collapse, resulting in a serious economic crisis in Taiwan.
Therefore, another choice for the government is to establish a system to support the housing disadvantaged and reduce their burden of living expenses. The government chose instead to build social housing and provide rent subsidies.
The past seven years have proved that more social housing still needs to be built to meet demands, despite the government’s best efforts.
Due to concerns of the rental housing black market, wherein landlords may increase rent or even cancel leases to avoid taxation, many tenants do not dare to apply for housing subsidies.
To resolve the current predicament, the social housing sector should increase incentives for the private sector to build social housing and even issue real estate securities to obtain resources from the abundant capital market.
The government has to face the problem of the rental housing black market and implement rental registration, or provide landlords tax relief or even subsidies. Or, as is the practice in Scotland, the government could impose heavy fines on landlords who do not register. Through these measures, all the subsidies and help for the tenants would be truly effective.
No matter how good the government’s intentions are, if it is only a castle in the sky, it will never resolve Taiwan’s housing dilemma.
Chang Ding-hsuan is an associate professor at Jinwen University of Science and Technology’s Department of Finance.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS