Vice President William Lai (賴清德) has kept his trip to Paraguay, which includes stopovers in New York and San Francisco, low profile.
He did not plan to meet any US politicians, but he was welcomed by overseas Taiwanese. Some overseas Chinese also welcomed Lai with banners of “no attacks on Taiwan.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members have mocked Lai’s trip, saying that keeping a low profile was undignified and that he should have canceled the trip rather than waste taxpayers’ money.
An opposition party like the KMT can never understand how to do things right. The KMT claims that other parties should be “discontinued,” but the KMT is the one that should be canceled.
The New York Times reported that Lai’s trip was to mitigate his firm opposition to China. Lai has portrayed himself to Washington and voters as a reliable leader. He made it clear that if he becomes president, he would not change the status of Taiwan. Keeping Taiwan safe is his priority.
It is correct that nothing has to be changed.
Taiwanese officials are able to visit other countries and a presidential election is to be held next year. This is a demonstration of sovereignty. If any change should be made, it should be to the national anthem, which is the song of the KMT.
China continues to intimidate Taiwan. This is the KMT’s fault, because it tries to compete with China for the status of “one China.” Beijing wants to annex Taiwan, but not other nations, because only the KMT in Taiwan wants to become another China.
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is similar to the muddle-headed KMT. The TPP has said that Taiwan should not become trapped by the disputes between independence and unification.
This displays considerable ignorance of the issue, given that Taiwan has been independent for some time. Otherwise, how could it hold presidential elections?
The most important thing is to maintain Taiwan’s freedom and democracy. Authoritarianism should not change Taiwan.
Under President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) leadership, Taiwan has improved in several aspects. Pension reforms have offended some beneficiaries, but helped a large number of people. This is what it means to have the courage of one’s vision as a politician.
In terms of national defense, diplomatic relations, the economy and human rights, Taiwan has made significant progress. Officials from Europe and the US visit Taiwan more often than before, while leaders of the US, France, Germany, Japan and Australia have all said that Taiwan’s future has everything to do with their countries, warning China not to invade Taiwan.
New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the KMT’s presidential candidate, has failed to manage a city well. How could he think to contest the election?
Former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-jie (柯文哲) said that the government has failed to take care of the younger generation, but what has he done for them? Ko’s social housing plan does not allow young people to own their homes.
Overall, Lai’s visit has proved that Taiwan is an independent country. There is no need to declare independence. There is no need to argue about independence or unification.
Taiwan should argue for democracy and freedom. Recent events prove that the KMT and the TPP are authoritarian parties.
Chen Chen
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS