On tuesday last week President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) expressed her concern and sympathy via a post on social media platform X to those affected by serious flooding in northern China in the wake of Typhoon Doksuri. Later, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) leadership, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Straits Exchange Foundation also offered their sympathy to people affected by the disaster.
The next day, the Presidential Office announced that it would be glad to provide assistance to the Chinese side. This series of warm words was a collective political action based on a consensus, and thus attracted much attention.
In recent years, cross-strait relations have been frozen due to China’s military threats, and a warm greeting is rare. Why did Tsai take the initiative to display humanitarianism this time? The greeting, which was on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Army Day” (建軍節), during which, as expected, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) administration showed off its military strength, drew a sharp contrast between Taiwan and China.
Starting on the morning of Tuesday last week, the PLA sent 10 warships and five warplanes to harass the waters and airspace around Taiwan, and all the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) mouthpieces also broadcast a propaganda video for the 96th anniversary of the founding of the PLA. The propaganda video featured a special report on the remarks made by Xi — who is chairman of the CCP’s Central Military Commission — to the PLA Air Force during his visit to China’s western war zone on July 26, when he told the PLA to promote the modernization of the military, overall combat capabilities and leaders’ ability in war preparation. While Chinese were flooded, the elite of the CCP continued to talk prominently to the world, displaying a hostile attitude.
After Tsai sent her greeting in simplified Chinese characters to the Chinese side, the DPP government quickly followed her.
First, such goodwill might cool hostility, as Tsai took concrete actions to ease tensions and help foster peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, with the expectation that this would boost the legitimacy of democratic Taiwan.
Second, this is also a chance for Taiwan to show the world how it deals with Chinese hostility in a civilized way and under pressure, proving that US and global military aid is necessary, while trying to gain the right to speak internationally.
Third, Taiwan is amid a fierce presidential campaign. Faced with the China-US confrontation, how exactly the ruling party can flexibly handle the essential contradictions between Taiwan and China is a matter of survival for the DPP, which is responsible for convincing voters with its appeals.
Therefore, after Typhoon Doksuri passed by Taiwan and hit China, causing a catastrophe along its coastal areas from the south to the north, the government offered an olive branch to send a political signal to Xi’s regime.
In the second half of this year, China must attend to quite a few political events rationally.
During this month, Vice President and DPP Chairman William Lai (賴清德) is set to stop over in New York and San Francisco.
In November, the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting is expected to be held in the US, and the question of who is to serve as Tsai’s envoy is being closely watched by China. If Beijing insists that power speaks louder than everything, at least Taiwan has shown it courtesy before resorting to power.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
Translated by Eddy Chang
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence