On tuesday last week President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) expressed her concern and sympathy via a post on social media platform X to those affected by serious flooding in northern China in the wake of Typhoon Doksuri. Later, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) leadership, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Straits Exchange Foundation also offered their sympathy to people affected by the disaster.
The next day, the Presidential Office announced that it would be glad to provide assistance to the Chinese side. This series of warm words was a collective political action based on a consensus, and thus attracted much attention.
In recent years, cross-strait relations have been frozen due to China’s military threats, and a warm greeting is rare. Why did Tsai take the initiative to display humanitarianism this time? The greeting, which was on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Army Day” (建軍節), during which, as expected, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) administration showed off its military strength, drew a sharp contrast between Taiwan and China.
Starting on the morning of Tuesday last week, the PLA sent 10 warships and five warplanes to harass the waters and airspace around Taiwan, and all the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) mouthpieces also broadcast a propaganda video for the 96th anniversary of the founding of the PLA. The propaganda video featured a special report on the remarks made by Xi — who is chairman of the CCP’s Central Military Commission — to the PLA Air Force during his visit to China’s western war zone on July 26, when he told the PLA to promote the modernization of the military, overall combat capabilities and leaders’ ability in war preparation. While Chinese were flooded, the elite of the CCP continued to talk prominently to the world, displaying a hostile attitude.
After Tsai sent her greeting in simplified Chinese characters to the Chinese side, the DPP government quickly followed her.
First, such goodwill might cool hostility, as Tsai took concrete actions to ease tensions and help foster peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, with the expectation that this would boost the legitimacy of democratic Taiwan.
Second, this is also a chance for Taiwan to show the world how it deals with Chinese hostility in a civilized way and under pressure, proving that US and global military aid is necessary, while trying to gain the right to speak internationally.
Third, Taiwan is amid a fierce presidential campaign. Faced with the China-US confrontation, how exactly the ruling party can flexibly handle the essential contradictions between Taiwan and China is a matter of survival for the DPP, which is responsible for convincing voters with its appeals.
Therefore, after Typhoon Doksuri passed by Taiwan and hit China, causing a catastrophe along its coastal areas from the south to the north, the government offered an olive branch to send a political signal to Xi’s regime.
In the second half of this year, China must attend to quite a few political events rationally.
During this month, Vice President and DPP Chairman William Lai (賴清德) is set to stop over in New York and San Francisco.
In November, the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting is expected to be held in the US, and the question of who is to serve as Tsai’s envoy is being closely watched by China. If Beijing insists that power speaks louder than everything, at least Taiwan has shown it courtesy before resorting to power.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
Translated by Eddy Chang
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS