Former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), chairman and presidential candidate of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), stated the other day in a live stream interview that Taiwan would “take a downturn” if he is not elected president next year and that he found the living conditions for southern Taiwan’s young people appalling.
During a visit to southern Taiwan, Ko met a 35-year-old man who is making a monthly salary of about NT$40,000, he said. With a house rent of NT$5,000, the young man had intended to apply for rent subsidies, but was prevented from doing so by the landlord. Without a strong financial income, he is not yet planning to get married.
Ko did not follow up the question of annual salaries, which reveals his ignorance of the salary structure of the private sector. This is hardly a surprise, as Ko’s work history only included being a doctor at National Taiwan University and mayor of Taipei, both of which were fixed salary jobs without year-end bonuses or dividends. As a result, Ko would not be aware that the income of private-sector employees is not fixed, but could fluctuate due to year-end bonuses or dividends.
Ko thought he could ask a few questions and become Mr Know-it-all, only to find that he is flaunting his ignorance of social conditions. It is a matter of opinion whether a monthly salary of NT$40,000 and rent of NT$5,000 in southern Taiwan allows one to “scrape by” or “live comfortably.”
The ironic thing is, as the chairman of the TPP, Ko seems to be paying his own employees in Taipei at a failing rate.
A simple search on job Web sites reveals that the TPP is not setting an example and showering its employees with generosity either. For example, an organization development commissioner is offered NT$30,000 to NT$35,000 per month, assistant editor is paid a minimum of NT$30,000 and video editor a minimum of NT$32,000, while a TPP legislature policy research assistant is paid NT$30,000 to NT$40,000.
The point is, all jobs require employees to work from the TPP’s headquarters in Taipei’s Zhongzheng District (中正區), a district where renting a house for NT$5,000 would be impossible.
If Ko wishes to excoriate the governing party for making young people’s lives increasingly harder, he could start by offering more salary to his future employees to be based in a city with a higher quality of living.
From mayor to chairman, Ko’s Achilles’ heel has always been raising issues without offering any solutions. If the young man in question had difficulties in applying for subsidies, Ko, whose party holds multiple legislative seats, could be galvanized into proposing improvements to the rent subsidy program. Or he could help with collecting evidence and appealing to the Ministry of the Interior along with an legislative proposal to deter other landlords from making similar moves.
Ko only wishes to invoke feelings of discontent and exploitation among young people; yet he would not use his power to assist them. Instead, he offers low pay to his future employees.
Ko, who is all talk and no action, is the last person anyone can count on to “save” Taiwan, least of all young people.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS