Recent media reports said that three problematic universities have been ordered to halt new enrollments. This has given rise to questions of whether the government should deal with the campuses and buildings of shuttered universities.
It is estimated that for academic year 2028, more than half of private universities would not be able to recruit Taiwanese students, and if they fail to attract international students or adult learners, these universities would be ordered to shut down.
In that case, aside from turning the campuses and buildings into public housing or sports centers, the government should consider bringing together corporate resources and long-term care services, and transform the sites into “dementia villages.”
Statistics released by the Taiwan Alzheimer Disease Association showed that as of December of last year, the number of people with Alzheimer’s or other forms of dementia totaled 320,000, or 1.37 percent of the population. In other words, one out of 72 people have some form of dementia.
Data and research have shown that the risk of people having dementia increases as they age. Taiwan must be prepared for such a future, and the government must plan how to take care of people with this condition. In an aging society like Taiwan, the dementia population would definitely continue to grow.
People with dementia lose cognitive function, which could lead to other diseases and make them emotionally sensitive. This puts families who look after them under great pressure. Although Taiwan has started to set up dementia-friendly communities, many of these areas are hybrid communities in which people with dementia live alongside the able-bodied. The community might be a friendly one, but it might not be able to satisfy their needs.
To improve the situation, the government could consider the example of the Netherlands’ De Hogeweyk — the world’s first “dementia village,” which opened in 2009 — and build our own. The village could be built on the site of a shuttered university to exclusively serve people with dementia. It would resemble an ordinary residential area, but the stores and facilities there should recruit staff who know and understand how to deal with people with dementia. Social workers and health professionals should also live inside or be stationed at the village.
Meanwhile, long-term care insurance companies and corporations can and should provide support and resources for establishing such a village. In this way, people with dementia would be assisted and attended to mentally and physically in a friendly, warm and professional way. This would lessen the burden on family members while allowing people with dementia to live with dignity.
Lu Chen-wei is an associate research fellow at the Association of Strategic Foresight.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS