Despite the three criminal indictments he is facing, former US president Donald Trump is actively campaigning for the presidency: By all accounts, his campaign is going well in parts of the Republican base.
A New York Times poll published on July 31 found that 54 percent of Republican voters would support Trump if the election for the party’s presidential nominee were held today.
Trump recently won the support of all Republican representatives from Alabama. Furthermore, his deranged rallies continue to draw a large and enthusiastic crowd: While in Pennsylvania, Trump called US President Joe Biden “an enemy of the state” and repeated baseless electoral fraud claims. Trump, a populist demagogue, is apt to sow distrust in the federal government as part of his strategy. This blatant manipulation of public trust results in voters becoming increasingly disenchanted with liberal democratic institutions.
Nevertheless, Trump’s unapologetic anti-communist stance makes him attractive among certain groups of Taiwanese and Taiwanese Americans. Amid geopolitical tensions between China and the US, some hope for another figure like former US president Ronald Reagan.
However, Trump’s unrestrained and pugnacious style is likely to drive a rift between the US and its allies.
For instance, in an interview with Fox News, Trump accused Taiwan of taking away semiconductor business from the US and said that Washington should have imposed tariffs on Taiwan. This sentiment is consistent with his “America First” policy, which led to the US’ withdrawal from international treaties and organizations.
There are signs that established Republicans are distancing themselves from Trump. Following the indictment of Trump, former US vice president Mike Pence said: “Anyone who puts himself over the constitution should never be president of the United States.”
Pence, who is also seeking the Republican Party’s presidential nomination, has made it clear that he would continue supporting Ukraine militarily if elected. Nevertheless, some Republicans remain skeptical about supporting Kyiv, seeing the Ukraine war as a result of NATO’s expansionism. Trump believes that he could end the war in one day by pressuring Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to the negotiation table.
This seems like an overwhelmingly optimistic solution to a very difficult problem. As Kyiv’s counteroffensive stagnates, Ukraine fatigue within the US spreads, leading some to portray support for the European country as a financial burden and to demand quick solutions. Most of these solutions are wishful thinking and they risk betraying Ukrainian soldiers who put their life on the line to defend against Russian expansionism.
Even if the Republican Party ends up not nominating Trump for the presidency, there is still the risk of other candidates emulating Trump’s “America First” policy that seems to attract a large portion of the US’ blue-collar workers. Trumpism can still survive without Trump.
Unlike Trump’s increasingly isolationist stance, the Biden administration has announced US$345 million in military aid for Taiwan, largely drawing on the US’ own stockpiles to expedite arms deliveries. Taiwan and Ukraine need a resolute US president to have their backs.
Biden’s leadership is far from perfect, but the resurgence of Trumpism would only leave the US weaker domestically and internationally, which would be a detriment to Taiwan and the democratic front against authoritarian regimes.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its