Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell by at least 60 percent last month compared with the same month last year, Brazilian Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Marina Silva said.
The good news came ahead of a regional summit that aims to prevent South America’s largest biome from hitting a calamitous tipping point.
The exact figure, which is based on the Deter satellite alert system, is to be released in the coming days, but independent analysts described the preliminary data as “incredible,” and said the improvement compared with the same month last year could be the best since 2005.
The rapid progress highlights the importance of political change. A year ago, under then-Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro the Amazon was suffering one of the worst cutting and burning seasons in recent history.
Yet since a new administration led by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took power at the start of the year, the government has penalized land grabbers, mounted paramilitary operations to drive out illegal miners, demarcated more indigenous land and created more conservation areas.
The results are likely to bolster Lula, Silva and other Brazilian hosts of an Amazon summit designed to reinforce regional cooperation that is taking place in Belem today and tomorrow with the participation of the nine rainforest nations: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela.
Silva said the acute threat of the climate crisis, which has brought record heat to many South American countries, means the summit has to be more than a show of unity; it needs to produce concrete and continuous results to ensure the Amazon does not reach a point where it starts to dry up and die off, which scientists have warned is drawing closer.
She has proposed that each country produces an action plan, that they jointly create a scientific panel to keep them updated with the latest data, and that they share best practices to achieve the three goals of the summit: protection of the forest and traditional peoples, and to combat inequality and strengthen democracy.
The key to the improvement in Brazil, which is home to 60 percent of the Amazon, had been a major target, she said.
“The main reason is the decision of Lula to aim for zero deforestation. Since then, we have created new conservation units and indigenous territories that have produced some results. Now we need to move towards a new model of prosperity that is less predatory, less damaging to local people and the forest,” Silva said.
In the first half of this year, deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell 34 percent from the same period last year, according to the Deter satellite alert system.
The figures for July, which is a more revealing month as it usually marks the onset of the clearance season, are still being collated, but Silva said they would show a significant improvement of “at least 60 percent” since the same period last year.
Independent analysts believe this might even reach as high as 70 percent.
“It’s incredible, totally crazy,” said Tasso Azevedo, a forest engineer and founder of the MapBiomas analytical group. “This is on course to be the sharpest fall since 2005. We are still figuring out why this is happening so fast.”
He believes the slowdown is due to a combination of factors: the resumption of embargoes and other protection activities by the government, improved technical analysis that reveal where problems are occurring more quickly and in more detail, greater involvement by banks to deny credit to landowners involved in clearing trees, and also wariness among farmers generated by the EU new laws on deforestation-free trade.
It might be no coincidence that deforestation has not fallen as impressively in the Cerrado savanna, which is not yet covered by the EU’s controls.
Silva said that a single month based on preliminary satellite data does not represent a trend.
A clearer picture might take a couple of years because the government’s annual tally runs from August to July, which means this year’s total would include the devastating past five months of Bolsonaro’s administration.
Nonetheless, Silva saw encouraging signs compared with the last time she was environment minister, from 2003 to 2008. Back then, the ministry had not been run down as it was during the Bolsonaro years and federal police mounted major support operations, which has not so far been the case this year, but it still took two years before policies started to show results.
This year, the ministry has had to make do with far fewer resources and to rely more on remote embargoes of soy and cattle based on satellite monitoring.
“It’s different now. The problem is more serious and more complex, but we have more experience and we know how to do it,” Silva said.
She hopes the improvement can be a springboard for a new cycle of prosperity in the Amazon and beyond, based on a sustainable use of resources, open markets to certified products, the development of a bioeconomy and greater financial support from wealthy countries that benefit from the rainforest’s role as a climate stabilizer and rainmaker.
Outside investment, trade and financial support would be crucial to show there is a viable alternative to destructive cattle ranches and soy plantations.
Due to her success in combating the worst excesses of forest clearance, Silva has come under fierce attack from the agribusiness and oil lobbies in Brazil, and the Brazilian National Congress has eroded the power of her ministry.
She faces an additional challenge from El Nino, which has brought horrifying temperatures of 38.9°C to the Chilean Andes in mid-winter, desperate water shortages to Uruguay and monthly heat records in several parts of Brazil. This is expected to worsen drought and fire risks in the Amazon over the coming months, though they would have been worse if the previous president’s policies have been continued.
Lula and Silva have committed their political futures to zero deforestation and plan to push for continued reductions in the run-up to the UN COP30 climate conference, which is expected to be held in the Amazon city of Belem in 2025.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS