Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell by at least 60 percent last month compared with the same month last year, Brazilian Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Marina Silva said.
The good news came ahead of a regional summit that aims to prevent South America’s largest biome from hitting a calamitous tipping point.
The exact figure, which is based on the Deter satellite alert system, is to be released in the coming days, but independent analysts described the preliminary data as “incredible,” and said the improvement compared with the same month last year could be the best since 2005.
The rapid progress highlights the importance of political change. A year ago, under then-Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro the Amazon was suffering one of the worst cutting and burning seasons in recent history.
Yet since a new administration led by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took power at the start of the year, the government has penalized land grabbers, mounted paramilitary operations to drive out illegal miners, demarcated more indigenous land and created more conservation areas.
The results are likely to bolster Lula, Silva and other Brazilian hosts of an Amazon summit designed to reinforce regional cooperation that is taking place in Belem today and tomorrow with the participation of the nine rainforest nations: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela.
Silva said the acute threat of the climate crisis, which has brought record heat to many South American countries, means the summit has to be more than a show of unity; it needs to produce concrete and continuous results to ensure the Amazon does not reach a point where it starts to dry up and die off, which scientists have warned is drawing closer.
She has proposed that each country produces an action plan, that they jointly create a scientific panel to keep them updated with the latest data, and that they share best practices to achieve the three goals of the summit: protection of the forest and traditional peoples, and to combat inequality and strengthen democracy.
The key to the improvement in Brazil, which is home to 60 percent of the Amazon, had been a major target, she said.
“The main reason is the decision of Lula to aim for zero deforestation. Since then, we have created new conservation units and indigenous territories that have produced some results. Now we need to move towards a new model of prosperity that is less predatory, less damaging to local people and the forest,” Silva said.
In the first half of this year, deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell 34 percent from the same period last year, according to the Deter satellite alert system.
The figures for July, which is a more revealing month as it usually marks the onset of the clearance season, are still being collated, but Silva said they would show a significant improvement of “at least 60 percent” since the same period last year.
Independent analysts believe this might even reach as high as 70 percent.
“It’s incredible, totally crazy,” said Tasso Azevedo, a forest engineer and founder of the MapBiomas analytical group. “This is on course to be the sharpest fall since 2005. We are still figuring out why this is happening so fast.”
He believes the slowdown is due to a combination of factors: the resumption of embargoes and other protection activities by the government, improved technical analysis that reveal where problems are occurring more quickly and in more detail, greater involvement by banks to deny credit to landowners involved in clearing trees, and also wariness among farmers generated by the EU new laws on deforestation-free trade.
It might be no coincidence that deforestation has not fallen as impressively in the Cerrado savanna, which is not yet covered by the EU’s controls.
Silva said that a single month based on preliminary satellite data does not represent a trend.
A clearer picture might take a couple of years because the government’s annual tally runs from August to July, which means this year’s total would include the devastating past five months of Bolsonaro’s administration.
Nonetheless, Silva saw encouraging signs compared with the last time she was environment minister, from 2003 to 2008. Back then, the ministry had not been run down as it was during the Bolsonaro years and federal police mounted major support operations, which has not so far been the case this year, but it still took two years before policies started to show results.
This year, the ministry has had to make do with far fewer resources and to rely more on remote embargoes of soy and cattle based on satellite monitoring.
“It’s different now. The problem is more serious and more complex, but we have more experience and we know how to do it,” Silva said.
She hopes the improvement can be a springboard for a new cycle of prosperity in the Amazon and beyond, based on a sustainable use of resources, open markets to certified products, the development of a bioeconomy and greater financial support from wealthy countries that benefit from the rainforest’s role as a climate stabilizer and rainmaker.
Outside investment, trade and financial support would be crucial to show there is a viable alternative to destructive cattle ranches and soy plantations.
Due to her success in combating the worst excesses of forest clearance, Silva has come under fierce attack from the agribusiness and oil lobbies in Brazil, and the Brazilian National Congress has eroded the power of her ministry.
She faces an additional challenge from El Nino, which has brought horrifying temperatures of 38.9°C to the Chilean Andes in mid-winter, desperate water shortages to Uruguay and monthly heat records in several parts of Brazil. This is expected to worsen drought and fire risks in the Amazon over the coming months, though they would have been worse if the previous president’s policies have been continued.
Lula and Silva have committed their political futures to zero deforestation and plan to push for continued reductions in the run-up to the UN COP30 climate conference, which is expected to be held in the Amazon city of Belem in 2025.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS