Lest you think air travel could not possibly get more miserable, climate change is here to prove you wrong.
Just as extreme heat makes people sluggish and unproductive at best, and threatens human life at worst, it also makes flying airplanes much more difficult. Hot air is less dense than cold air, its molecules zipping around at higher speeds, meaning planes have less lift when the mercury rises. That makes it harder for them to take off and stay aloft.
Airlines and pilots are likely to often choose to delay flights or unload passengers and luggage to shed weight from planes when the temperature climbs too high. This leads to cascading schedule disruptions across the entire system, along with passengers occasionally being trapped for hours on runways inside roasting aircraft.
It is a problem that is expected to only get worse as the planet warms and extreme heat of the sort blanketing the southern US this summer becomes more routine.
Up to 30 percent of all US flights, on average, might be subject to weight restrictions during periods of high heat by 2050, a 2017 Columbia University study says.
Barring a miraculous technological breakthrough, the aerospace industry has no real solution to overcome the harsh laws of physics.“This is a physical restriction related to air density and there are not a whole lot of direct technological fixes for it,” said Ethan Coffel, an assistant professor at Syracuse University, who was an author of the 2017 study.
Most of us probably think of snow and ice as the biggest threat to on-time flights, but heat causes far more delays, Bloomberg News reported recently.
Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport, for example, had roughly twice as many weather delays in the summer of last year than it did last winter.
The high-heat problem is especially hard to overcome for airports with short runways, which give planes less room to gain the momentum they need to take off. New York’s LaGuardia Airport has a particularly short runway and no space to expand, constrained as it is by Flushing Bay and dense Queens neighborhoods.
Unfortunately for Americans’ mental health, LaGuardia is also what the Federal Aviation Administration calls a “pacing airport,” or one that has a high volume of traffic; it is routinely unable to handle that volume of traffic, and ruins air schedules around the country as a result.
“Scheduling is a disaster every day as it is, and heat just makes it worse,” independent aviation consultant Robert Mann said.
Airports at high altitudes, such as Denver, are also uniquely vulnerable to high heat, as are the ever-warming cities of the US’ Sun Belt. Surprisingly, the hottest of those cities, Phoenix, suffers relatively few weight-restriction days thanks to its longer-than-usual runways, which are also made of specially reinforced concrete.
Of course, not every airport can afford the expense and delay of tearing up old runways and building new, stronger ones. Cancellations still happen, even in Phoenix.
Workers on sun-baked taxiways and runways — which are usually much hotter than the atmosphere around the airport — are also especially vulnerable to the “heat island” effect. Workers in extreme conditions would need longer breaks or risk falling ill, causing airports to be short-staffed.
Aerospace manufacturers are always working on ways to make planes lighter and more efficient, but most of that progress has already been made. Barring revolutionary new materials, any further gains would be incremental at best. So, until humanity figures out how to make airplanes out of gossamer, old-fashioned solutions to heat must be relied upon: moving flights to cooler times, lengthening and strengthening runways and ditching weight.
The net effect is that flight delays are likely to keep rising, adding to climate change’s growing impact on air travel. It is already making turbulence more dangerous, lengthening flights because of changing wind patterns and fueling the extreme weather that leads to more delays.
As with every other effect of rising heat, the most effective solution would be to stop burning the fossil fuels that contribute to warming — including the fuels burned by airplanes. Air travel is not much fun these days anyway.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. A former managing editor of Fortune.com, he ran the HuffPost’s business and technology coverage and was a reporter and editor for the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
With assistance from Brooke Sutherland.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS