Great power competition is expected to only continue to increase frictions along geopolitical fault lines. Caught between China and the US, no other regional organization recognizes this more acutely than ASEAN. Concerns have been raised as to how the organization representing 650 million people is expected to navigate the tense waters of this strategic region as the frequency of crises becomes more recurrent.
Singapore Institute of International Affairs chairman Simon Tay (戴尚志), during his opening address for the 15th ASEAN & Asia Forum, said that the world was heading into a “concrisis,” a convergence of crises and global issues.
VISION
The concept of “ASEAN centrality” has been championed by the organization to maintain cohesion and identify the interests that external powers have in the region. Holding this year’s chairmanship, Indonesia has expressed its vision of ASEAN as the “epicentrum of growth.” Jakarta aims to “strengthen economic recovery and make Southeast Asia the world’s engine of sustainable growth.”
However, climate change, inequality and the breakdown of multilateralism pose existential and persistent challenges to the region.
“ASEAN centrality is not a panacea,” ASEAN Secretary-General Kao Kim Hourn said, but it is something that can be used to help deal with current and upcoming challenges. Kao said that ASEAN cannot afford to take sides or pay lip service to the great powers.
CRISIS MANAGEMENT
The problem remains that external powers might misunderstand the interests of ASEAN states. Former Vietnamese deputy minister of foreign affairs and former ambassador to the US Pham Quang Vinh said that when approached by Washington to join the Administration of US President Joe Biden’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity, the Vietnamese government was initially reluctant, as it was concerned about how China would react toward it.
In the past years, ASEAN has been tested internally and externally. The 2021 military coup in Myanmar has revealed the organization’s limitations in resolving the crisis, as “non-interference” is a fundamental principle of the organization. China’s growing influence in member states such as Cambodia also weakened ASEAN’s solidarity when the organization failed to issue a joint statement on the South China Sea when Phnom Penh refused to mention the issue.
DIALOGUE
Despite the challenges that Southeast Asian nations face, ASEAN continues to matter as it remains the key platform for regional cooperation. At the recent 56th ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Jakarta, the organization’s 11 key dialogue partners, including the US, China and Russia, were in attendance.
That states locked in confrontation could congregate under ASEAN’s auspices demonstrates the organization’s significance at a time when the prospect of engagement between belligerent great powers continues to fade.
Until a new equilibrium in international politics is achieved and solutions to our collective existential threats are found, crisis is expected to continue to define the decades ahead of us.
In the forum’s final keynote speech, Singaporean Minister of Health Ong Ye Kung (王乙康) gave his definition of crises: “They are painful and destructive, but they pass.”
Nigel Li is a specialist on Eurasia and Russian foreign policy. He reports from Singapore.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS