A number of traffic accidents that happened a while ago broke people’s hearts, and people started talking about Taiwan being “a living hell for pedestrians.”
To deal with the issue, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications has released a series of measures to ensure pedestrians’ safety. These measures have been applied since June 30.
However, shortly after the new rules had been implemented, several video clips revealing some pedestrians’ bad behavior were posted on the Internet. In these clips, some pedestrians were staring at their phones with their heads down when crossing the road; others were deliberately walking at a much slower pace; others still were intentionally standing on the crosswalk without moving forward. Due to these bad manners, the public started to believe that the new traffic measures would not work, and the “pedestrian first” rules would only cause more traffic problems and accidents.
For most of the time, I am a pedestrian. A month after the measures came into effect, I would like to share my feelings about the rules.
When I cross the road these days, almost every car lets me pass first. Before the new measures, I would be intimidated by scooters coming so close toward me, but over the past month, this did not happen as frequently as before. Most drivers abided by rules and stopped before a crosswalk. This means a lot for pedestrians, who feel much safer than before.
I do not have any concrete data proving that the number of traffic accidents has decreased, but I have personally experienced that pedestrians’ rights are now valued more highly. When I cross the road at a quicker pace, I always nod to show my gratitude to drivers who give way, and most of them respond to my gesture. This behavior is mutual, which would allow both sides to feel respected and loved.
I also hope that all pedestrians can be more focused instead of checking their phones on the crosswalk, and no one should waste drivers’ time on purpose. Doing this would protect the pedestrians’ own safety as well.
Ridding Taiwan of the notoriety of being “a living hell for pedestrians” is not an easy task. There might be a need to evaluate whether it is feasible to regulate pedestrian conduct or implement pedestrian-only signals.
However, at this moment people can say for sure that the government has made a good start.
Wu Tsai-fang
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS