A number of traffic accidents that happened a while ago broke people’s hearts, and people started talking about Taiwan being “a living hell for pedestrians.”
To deal with the issue, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications has released a series of measures to ensure pedestrians’ safety. These measures have been applied since June 30.
However, shortly after the new rules had been implemented, several video clips revealing some pedestrians’ bad behavior were posted on the Internet. In these clips, some pedestrians were staring at their phones with their heads down when crossing the road; others were deliberately walking at a much slower pace; others still were intentionally standing on the crosswalk without moving forward. Due to these bad manners, the public started to believe that the new traffic measures would not work, and the “pedestrian first” rules would only cause more traffic problems and accidents.
For most of the time, I am a pedestrian. A month after the measures came into effect, I would like to share my feelings about the rules.
When I cross the road these days, almost every car lets me pass first. Before the new measures, I would be intimidated by scooters coming so close toward me, but over the past month, this did not happen as frequently as before. Most drivers abided by rules and stopped before a crosswalk. This means a lot for pedestrians, who feel much safer than before.
I do not have any concrete data proving that the number of traffic accidents has decreased, but I have personally experienced that pedestrians’ rights are now valued more highly. When I cross the road at a quicker pace, I always nod to show my gratitude to drivers who give way, and most of them respond to my gesture. This behavior is mutual, which would allow both sides to feel respected and loved.
I also hope that all pedestrians can be more focused instead of checking their phones on the crosswalk, and no one should waste drivers’ time on purpose. Doing this would protect the pedestrians’ own safety as well.
Ridding Taiwan of the notoriety of being “a living hell for pedestrians” is not an easy task. There might be a need to evaluate whether it is feasible to regulate pedestrian conduct or implement pedestrian-only signals.
However, at this moment people can say for sure that the government has made a good start.
Wu Tsai-fang
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS