A number of traffic accidents that happened a while ago broke people’s hearts, and people started talking about Taiwan being “a living hell for pedestrians.”
To deal with the issue, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications has released a series of measures to ensure pedestrians’ safety. These measures have been applied since June 30.
However, shortly after the new rules had been implemented, several video clips revealing some pedestrians’ bad behavior were posted on the Internet. In these clips, some pedestrians were staring at their phones with their heads down when crossing the road; others were deliberately walking at a much slower pace; others still were intentionally standing on the crosswalk without moving forward. Due to these bad manners, the public started to believe that the new traffic measures would not work, and the “pedestrian first” rules would only cause more traffic problems and accidents.
For most of the time, I am a pedestrian. A month after the measures came into effect, I would like to share my feelings about the rules.
When I cross the road these days, almost every car lets me pass first. Before the new measures, I would be intimidated by scooters coming so close toward me, but over the past month, this did not happen as frequently as before. Most drivers abided by rules and stopped before a crosswalk. This means a lot for pedestrians, who feel much safer than before.
I do not have any concrete data proving that the number of traffic accidents has decreased, but I have personally experienced that pedestrians’ rights are now valued more highly. When I cross the road at a quicker pace, I always nod to show my gratitude to drivers who give way, and most of them respond to my gesture. This behavior is mutual, which would allow both sides to feel respected and loved.
I also hope that all pedestrians can be more focused instead of checking their phones on the crosswalk, and no one should waste drivers’ time on purpose. Doing this would protect the pedestrians’ own safety as well.
Ridding Taiwan of the notoriety of being “a living hell for pedestrians” is not an easy task. There might be a need to evaluate whether it is feasible to regulate pedestrian conduct or implement pedestrian-only signals.
However, at this moment people can say for sure that the government has made a good start.
Wu Tsai-fang
Taipei
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS