Hon Hai Group founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) recently published an opinion editorial in the Washington Post, criticizing President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration for refusing to accept the “one China framework,” while stressing that Taiwan should directly negotiate with China based on the framework. Gou even wrote that the country should avoid unhealthy reliance on the US.
However, if Gou thinks that Taipei should have direct talks with Beijing on the premise of the “one China framework,” perhaps he should try to persuade the Taiwanese voters, instead of Washington or US citizens. In fact, from the Koo-Wang (辜汪) talks in 1993 to the Ma-Xi (馬習) meeting in 2015, there were already some examples of direct dialogue between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. So the right way to proceed is to gain Taiwanese voters’ support, rather than chasing after the far-away at the expense of what is within reach.
People know that Gou always wants to run for president. Instead of trying to hide his ambition, he should openly announce his presidential bid as an independent presidential candidate. This would surely be far more effective than writing an opinion editorial.
In addition, the interaction between Taiwan and the US has been closely related to China’s friendliness or hostility. If China is willing to give up annexing Taiwan by force or give up sending its warplanes and warships to harass the island, why should Taiwan procure more weapons from the US, and why should more military exchanges between Taiwan and the US be necessary?
Gou would rather complain to the US about the Taiwanese government’s flaws than ask Taiwanese for a chance just to practice his ideals, while deliberately reversing the cause and effect of their helplessness in striving for US support. And his ignorance of Beijing’s actions is totally illogical, and such a view is unpresentable.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS