Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) recently said that a Japanese lawmaker had told him that Taiwan should give up all hope of being able to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
Hiroshige Seko, secretary-general of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in the House of Councillors in the Japanese Diet, has since clarified that he never said this to Ko, saying that the LDP’s stance has always been to welcome Taiwan to join the CPTPP and keep working on it.
Ko had thrown Taiwan-friendly Seko under the bus by spouting nonsense. He equivocated, saying that a Japanese politician would tactfully say something is “difficult” without stating outright that it is impossible. Instead, Ko presumed to add the word “impossible” himself. To reduce his own embarrassment, Ko asked the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to say clearly when Taiwan could join the CPTPP.
If the governing party is so incompetent that it is unable to secure Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP, opposition parties would have the opportunity to demonstrate their own competence, proving they are ready to rule the country. They could offer a complete plan for joining the CPTPP to attract voters.
Ko could only resort to criticizing the DPP and spreading defeatism. As a presidential candidate, he should ask himself, if he were to win the presidential election, how could he ensure Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP?
Only two and a half years after applying, having secured the agreement of 11 members, the UK formally joined the CPTPP last month, the first new member since the bloc’s creation in 2018.
In September last year, China and Taiwan applied for CPTPP membership. A signatory is approved by a consensus of all members, so even if primary countries such as Japan and Australia support Taiwan’s accession, Beijing would be a barrier if it pressures any one of the members to oppose Taiwan’s membership, and this is why Seko said to Ko that “any political problems must be solved.”
Ko exaggerated Seko’s remarks by saying: “Taiwan should give up hope.”
Taiwan could receive more international sympathy, and the accession could build a consensus and unite Taiwanese. National leaders, concentrating on a vision, would not limit themselves from any interference.
Taiwan meets the CPTPP’s high requirements with its global trade network, yet has not joined the bloc, as Beijing hinders its accession.
Ko does not investigate who pulls the strings, but blames the victims instead, using political trickery by reversing causation.
Given US-China tensions, what defines the possibility of Taiwan’s diplomacy is being rewritten. The US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, clearly stating that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not refer to Taiwan. When Taiwan wanted to join the UN as Taiwan, not as the Republic of China, many thought it was impossible and not worth the effort, but now, as the wall built by Beijing is gradually starting to show cracks, people can believe the impossible can be made possible.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Polly Chiu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS