Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) recently said that a Japanese lawmaker had told him that Taiwan should give up all hope of being able to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
Hiroshige Seko, secretary-general of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in the House of Councillors in the Japanese Diet, has since clarified that he never said this to Ko, saying that the LDP’s stance has always been to welcome Taiwan to join the CPTPP and keep working on it.
Ko had thrown Taiwan-friendly Seko under the bus by spouting nonsense. He equivocated, saying that a Japanese politician would tactfully say something is “difficult” without stating outright that it is impossible. Instead, Ko presumed to add the word “impossible” himself. To reduce his own embarrassment, Ko asked the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to say clearly when Taiwan could join the CPTPP.
If the governing party is so incompetent that it is unable to secure Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP, opposition parties would have the opportunity to demonstrate their own competence, proving they are ready to rule the country. They could offer a complete plan for joining the CPTPP to attract voters.
Ko could only resort to criticizing the DPP and spreading defeatism. As a presidential candidate, he should ask himself, if he were to win the presidential election, how could he ensure Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP?
Only two and a half years after applying, having secured the agreement of 11 members, the UK formally joined the CPTPP last month, the first new member since the bloc’s creation in 2018.
In September last year, China and Taiwan applied for CPTPP membership. A signatory is approved by a consensus of all members, so even if primary countries such as Japan and Australia support Taiwan’s accession, Beijing would be a barrier if it pressures any one of the members to oppose Taiwan’s membership, and this is why Seko said to Ko that “any political problems must be solved.”
Ko exaggerated Seko’s remarks by saying: “Taiwan should give up hope.”
Taiwan could receive more international sympathy, and the accession could build a consensus and unite Taiwanese. National leaders, concentrating on a vision, would not limit themselves from any interference.
Taiwan meets the CPTPP’s high requirements with its global trade network, yet has not joined the bloc, as Beijing hinders its accession.
Ko does not investigate who pulls the strings, but blames the victims instead, using political trickery by reversing causation.
Given US-China tensions, what defines the possibility of Taiwan’s diplomacy is being rewritten. The US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, clearly stating that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not refer to Taiwan. When Taiwan wanted to join the UN as Taiwan, not as the Republic of China, many thought it was impossible and not worth the effort, but now, as the wall built by Beijing is gradually starting to show cracks, people can believe the impossible can be made possible.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Polly Chiu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS