Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) recently said that a Japanese lawmaker had told him that Taiwan should give up all hope of being able to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
Hiroshige Seko, secretary-general of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in the House of Councillors in the Japanese Diet, has since clarified that he never said this to Ko, saying that the LDP’s stance has always been to welcome Taiwan to join the CPTPP and keep working on it.
Ko had thrown Taiwan-friendly Seko under the bus by spouting nonsense. He equivocated, saying that a Japanese politician would tactfully say something is “difficult” without stating outright that it is impossible. Instead, Ko presumed to add the word “impossible” himself. To reduce his own embarrassment, Ko asked the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to say clearly when Taiwan could join the CPTPP.
If the governing party is so incompetent that it is unable to secure Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP, opposition parties would have the opportunity to demonstrate their own competence, proving they are ready to rule the country. They could offer a complete plan for joining the CPTPP to attract voters.
Ko could only resort to criticizing the DPP and spreading defeatism. As a presidential candidate, he should ask himself, if he were to win the presidential election, how could he ensure Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP?
Only two and a half years after applying, having secured the agreement of 11 members, the UK formally joined the CPTPP last month, the first new member since the bloc’s creation in 2018.
In September last year, China and Taiwan applied for CPTPP membership. A signatory is approved by a consensus of all members, so even if primary countries such as Japan and Australia support Taiwan’s accession, Beijing would be a barrier if it pressures any one of the members to oppose Taiwan’s membership, and this is why Seko said to Ko that “any political problems must be solved.”
Ko exaggerated Seko’s remarks by saying: “Taiwan should give up hope.”
Taiwan could receive more international sympathy, and the accession could build a consensus and unite Taiwanese. National leaders, concentrating on a vision, would not limit themselves from any interference.
Taiwan meets the CPTPP’s high requirements with its global trade network, yet has not joined the bloc, as Beijing hinders its accession.
Ko does not investigate who pulls the strings, but blames the victims instead, using political trickery by reversing causation.
Given US-China tensions, what defines the possibility of Taiwan’s diplomacy is being rewritten. The US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, clearly stating that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not refer to Taiwan. When Taiwan wanted to join the UN as Taiwan, not as the Republic of China, many thought it was impossible and not worth the effort, but now, as the wall built by Beijing is gradually starting to show cracks, people can believe the impossible can be made possible.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Polly Chiu
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS