Perpetrators carrying out transnational telecommunications fraud originally came from Taichung. The typical pattern of attack is Taiwanese fraudsters relocate to a third country, such as Cambodia, to lure victims living in another country, such as China, to hand over money to local mules in person or deposit it in a local bank or virtual service account.
Initially, these fraudulent activities ran on telecommunications networks that required strong authentication, but since 2006, fraudsters have learned to exploit voice-over IP technology to evade detection and tracking by law enforcement agencies.
More recently, they have evolved to leverage more modern communication tools such as short message service, Facebook and other social networking sites.
As telecom fraud has grown more sophisticated and proliferated, it has become a major social problem. As a result, failure to eradicate telecom fraud has consistently ranked very high on surveys of public complaints about the government.
To curb telecom fraud, the National Communications Commission said it has urged telecoms to adopt the following two measures. First, the system should automatically block calls originating from numbers that have been blacklisted in a government-managed anti-fraud database. Second, when an incoming call begins with the numbers “+886,” indicating that the true source caller ID is masked, the system should display an alert to notify the callee.
Although these two measures might be helpful in stopping telecom fraud, they are not enough. Instead, the telecommunications industry should consider this pain point as a business opportunity, and take the initiative to leverage the massive amount of information available and the unique service position of a telecom to develop an easy-to-deploy solution that could solve the problem.
The following are three ideas that could effectively stop telecom fraud. They can operate independently, but also complement one another.
The first is to aggressively detect phone numbers that perpetrators use to carry out telecom fraud based on their specific usage patterns. Telecom fraudsters need to continuously make tens or hundreds of phone calls a day before they succeed in defrauding someone. As such, the caller’s number usually shows a unique combination of the following three call patterns: (1) the number of calls it makes within a unit of time is many times higher than that of phones used by ordinary people; (2) the numbers it calls are rarely repeated, and the callee numbers are not correlated in any obvious way; and (3) it rarely receives calls.
Based on the above patterns, after a telecom allocates a phone number to a new user, it should keep track of the usage pattern of this number for a period to determine whether it is being used for fraud.
The operator could work with law enforcement authorities to carry out an in-depth content analysis of some of the calls initiated by a suspect number to ascertain whether it is indeed being used for fraud. The implementation of the above mechanism is relatively straightforward, and the false positive rate is likely to be close to zero.
Telecom fraudsters take advantage of victims’ confusion and panic to induce them to make rash judgements. To combat this, telecoms could, using the latest telecom fraud techniques, mount high-fidelity simulated attacks on a target user, and, after each drill, explain to the “victim” the attacker’s specific techniques and their mistakes in the process, thereby enhancing each target user’s overall readiness to handle real-world fraudulent calls.
A similar drill mechanism has achieved great success in protecting users against malicious e-mail attacks, and should be equally effective in improving users’ immunity against telecom fraud. Moreover, since telecoms have access to subscribers’ personal information, they could leverage this to increase the degree of believability of simulated fraud attacks.
The third is to deploy a robot telephone assistant to answer calls from a unknown number, filter out fraudulent, advertising, sales or harassing calls, and then decide whether to transfer them to the user it serves. To do its job well, this robot assistant must keep abreast of the latest wording, routines and tricks used by telecom fraudsters. It should also have the capability to identify the caller’s organization, look up the organization’s number and call back. Such call-back capability would significantly increase the difficulty of perpetrating telecom fraud.
With the advent of ChatGPT, people are worried that telecom fraudsters might use the technology to automate and scale up their operations. However, the good guys could apply the same ChatGPT technology to, for example, facilitate the implementation of the three anti-telecom-fraud ideas described above.
In the constant technological tug-of-war between telecom fraudsters and their nemesis, which side eventually wins out would depend critically on the extent to which they could innovate on top of ChatGPT.
Chiueh Tzi-cker is a joint appointment professor in the Institute of Information Security at National Tsing Hua University.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS