The US House of Representatives on Tuesday last week passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which aims to counter efforts by China to exclude Taiwan from participating in international organizations. It is a milestone, clarifying Taiwan’s rightful status on the global stage through an allied nation’s legislation.
For decades, China has deliberately misrepresented Resolution 2758 passed by UN General Assembly in 1971, which “[recognizes] that the representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China are the only lawful representatives of China to the United Nations” and “[d]ecides to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it.” Beijing has used the resolution as the basis of its “one China” principle to push exclusive recognition of China and to exclude Taiwan from international organizations, such as the WHO, the International Civil Aviation Organization and Interpol, to the detriment of global health and security efforts.
Beijing has further distorted the resolution to assert its sovereignty claims over Taiwan, which could be a pretext for blocking international aid that Taiwan requires to protect against China’s coercion and a possible invasion. Beijing’s overly broad interpretation not only runs counter to the original text of the resolution; it also ignores that China never exercised sovereignty over Taiwan.
In 2007, the US and ally countries, including Australia, Canada, Japan and New Zealand, issued stern protests to oppose a letter by then-UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon that said “in accordance with that resolution [2758], the UN considers Taiwan to be an integral part of the People’s Republic of China.” Ban apologized and pledged to drop the fallacious remark.
The bill passed by the US House clearly states that Resolution 2758 only deals with the issues of China’s representation, and does not apply to Taiwan.
“The resolution did not address the issue of representation of Taiwan and its people in the United Nations or any related organizations, nor did the resolution take a position on the relationship between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan or include any statement pertaining to Taiwan’s sovereignty,” it says.
Once the bill is approved by the US Senate and signed in to law by the president, it requires the US to support Taiwan’s bids to join international organizations, and to oppose attempts by Beijing “to resolve Taiwan’s status by distorting the decisions, language, policies, or procedures” of such organizations. It also “opposes any initiative that seeks to change Taiwan’s status without the consent of the [Taiwanese] people.”
Although a member country’s national legislation cannot affect the effectiveness of a UN resolution, the passage of the bill has demonstrated an unprecedented level of support for Taiwan in Washington. Shifting from a policy of ambiguity and international appeasement to avoid conflict with China, this legislation shows that the US is taking a definite stand to clarify the facts of Taiwan’s sovereignty, a significant step against China’s distortion of Taiwan’s legal status in UN and the global arena.
The bill is also considered a countermeasure against China’s escalating aggression against Taiwan. It is a strong signal from the world’s leading democratic country that China’s hegemony and expansionism must be opposed.
For Taiwan, the US bill is definitely a show of support, but more must be done to ensure that the global community understands Taiwan’s sovereignty as this would result in more international recognition and participation in international organizations.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS