The US House of Representatives on Tuesday last week passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which aims to counter efforts by China to exclude Taiwan from participating in international organizations. It is a milestone, clarifying Taiwan’s rightful status on the global stage through an allied nation’s legislation.
For decades, China has deliberately misrepresented Resolution 2758 passed by UN General Assembly in 1971, which “[recognizes] that the representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China are the only lawful representatives of China to the United Nations” and “[d]ecides to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it.” Beijing has used the resolution as the basis of its “one China” principle to push exclusive recognition of China and to exclude Taiwan from international organizations, such as the WHO, the International Civil Aviation Organization and Interpol, to the detriment of global health and security efforts.
Beijing has further distorted the resolution to assert its sovereignty claims over Taiwan, which could be a pretext for blocking international aid that Taiwan requires to protect against China’s coercion and a possible invasion. Beijing’s overly broad interpretation not only runs counter to the original text of the resolution; it also ignores that China never exercised sovereignty over Taiwan.
In 2007, the US and ally countries, including Australia, Canada, Japan and New Zealand, issued stern protests to oppose a letter by then-UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon that said “in accordance with that resolution [2758], the UN considers Taiwan to be an integral part of the People’s Republic of China.” Ban apologized and pledged to drop the fallacious remark.
The bill passed by the US House clearly states that Resolution 2758 only deals with the issues of China’s representation, and does not apply to Taiwan.
“The resolution did not address the issue of representation of Taiwan and its people in the United Nations or any related organizations, nor did the resolution take a position on the relationship between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan or include any statement pertaining to Taiwan’s sovereignty,” it says.
Once the bill is approved by the US Senate and signed in to law by the president, it requires the US to support Taiwan’s bids to join international organizations, and to oppose attempts by Beijing “to resolve Taiwan’s status by distorting the decisions, language, policies, or procedures” of such organizations. It also “opposes any initiative that seeks to change Taiwan’s status without the consent of the [Taiwanese] people.”
Although a member country’s national legislation cannot affect the effectiveness of a UN resolution, the passage of the bill has demonstrated an unprecedented level of support for Taiwan in Washington. Shifting from a policy of ambiguity and international appeasement to avoid conflict with China, this legislation shows that the US is taking a definite stand to clarify the facts of Taiwan’s sovereignty, a significant step against China’s distortion of Taiwan’s legal status in UN and the global arena.
The bill is also considered a countermeasure against China’s escalating aggression against Taiwan. It is a strong signal from the world’s leading democratic country that China’s hegemony and expansionism must be opposed.
For Taiwan, the US bill is definitely a show of support, but more must be done to ensure that the global community understands Taiwan’s sovereignty as this would result in more international recognition and participation in international organizations.
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS