Just when you thought that former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and his Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) could not be any more tone deaf, they leave everyone dumbstruck with another inexplicable exploit.
Any English speaker could have seen the latest controversy coming a mile away. The story broke on Sunday with a Facebook post by the podcast Bailingguo News (百靈果News) exposing the slogan “Vote White, Vote Right” prominently featured on the English version of the TPP’s Web site. As the commenters pointed out, the phrase would immediately be understood as supportive of far-right white supremacist politics, which is not what the party intended.
To make matters even more embarrassing, TPP Legislator Lai Hsiang-ling (賴香伶) tagged former US president Donald Trump in the post to get his feedback. As some commenters said, not even Trump would dare mouth such a blatantly white supremacist slogan.
It was clearly an honest mistake, as the TPP has adopted the color white to symbolize its political ideology as an alternative to the blue and green camps. Using color as ideological shorthand is par for the course in Taiwanese politics, and something Ko has fully embraced — even his 2014 book was titled Power of White (白色的力量) (or White Power if the translator is feeling less generous). Pairing that with Ko’s former tagline “Do the right thing, do things right,” immortalized for better or worse in a 2018 rap with Chunyan (春艷), and you get an admittedly catchy rhyming slogan. Too bad it does not mean what they thought.
The debacle also came just one day after Ko hosted his controversial “KP Show,” which was dogged by accusations of illegal solicitation of overseas donations. It also engendered a weeks-long tit-for-tat with the Taipei Music Center, which turned down his application to hold the “concert,” citing rules against holding political events at the venue that were put in place during Ko’s administration.
The TPP took down the Web site banner yesterday morning following the blowup, saying it was also overhauling its English site. In its defense, it said Taiwan does not have the concept of white supremacy, and that the implication was unintended.
Putting aside that the tendrils of white supremacy reach everywhere, manifesting most commonly in Taiwan as white privilege, this incident reflects extremely poorly on the TPP for multiple reasons. Not everyone has to be familiar with the intricacies of English — indeed, assuming everyone should be is a white supremacist idea — but for a party that wants to take the Presidential Office come January, one would hope that it would be more sensitive to diplomatic phrasing.
Taiwan has a precarious international standing and must be careful with its words, in Chinese and in English. Countless hours have been spent by diplomats worldwide carefully crafting language that supports Taiwan without provoking its angry neighbor. Any Taiwanese leader and their team must be intimately aware of these intricacies. This incident shows that the TPP is not aware, or at best did not solicit feedback from people within the party who might be.
The unfortunate slogan is also the exact kind of thing that would draw the international media spotlight, casting not only the TPP, but the whole of Taiwan in a bad light. No one will accuse the party of intentionally supporting white supremacy, but such a mistake is embarrassing and implies a wider cultural gap between Taiwan and its Western allies than really exists. The TPP should feel chastised, and hopefully stick to its vow to improve oversight of its English content.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
RSS