The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DBGAS) on Friday lowered its GDP growth estimate for the April-to-June quarter to 1.48 percent on an annual basis, down from the 1.82 percent expansion it predicted in May, as two major GDP components — net exports and gross capital formation — continued to contract.
The statistics agency’s downward adjustment in its economic growth estimate was unsurprising, as recent data on economic activity showed that weak global demand and prolonged inventory adjustments have continued to weigh on Taiwan’s export-reliant economy, while a reduction in domestic investments in construction and machinery equipment also dragged.
While the second-quarter figure failed to meet the DGBAS’ May forecast, it still represented a return to positive territory from the 2.87 percent contraction registered in the first quarter. Moreover, the latest data indicated the economy also rebounded from a technical recession in the previous two quarters, underlining recovering growth momentum in the economy, albeit weaker than expected.
The DGBAS on Friday did not unveil its growth forecast for this year, but the agency is likely to lower its previous full-year forecast of 2.04 percent on Aug. 18 after more data are gathered and further analyses are performed. The general view among economists is that Taiwan’s economy would have difficulty growing 2 percent this year considering the doldrums and global external headwinds faced by local manufacturers, but GDP growth should be able to stay above 1 percent.
The central bank last month trimmed its projection for Taiwan’s GDP growth for this year from 2.21 percent to 1.72 percent. Several research institutes have also revised downward their estimates, with Academia Sinica and the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research last week cutting their numbers to 1.56 percent and 1.66 percent respectively, while the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research early this month lowered its prediction to 1.6 percent, and the Taiwan Research Institute last month projected growth of 1.45 percent.
A closer look at the DGBAS’ data shows that domestic demand led the economic recovery in the second quarter, with private consumption surging by 12.14 percent year-on-year, the best performance in 33 years. The stronger-than-expected domestic demand came as the economy continued to add jobs, services demand recovered further and the tourism sector remained vibrant. It is unusual that domestic demand in Taiwan could help offset the negative effects of slowing external demand so strongly, as seen in the second quarter.
On a positive note, the recovery in private consumption is expected to remain the main driver of Taiwan’s growth in the second half of the year, given the normalization of domestic activities and a resilient stock market, as well as the recovery in the labor market and stabilization in consumer inflation. More signs have surfaced of people’s growing confidence in stock investment, as central banks approach the end of their interest-rate-hike cycles in the next few quarters. If local stocks could secure continued improvement in fundamentals, it would further support private consumption.
There is still much uncertainty for domestic investment and external demand amid further inventory destocking and lingering geopolitical tensions.
However, exports tend to post a strong showing in the fourth quarter, as it is traditionally the peak season for consumption in Europe and the US, and at least the decline in global semiconductor sales appears to be bottoming, coupled with growing optimism about chips related to artificial intelligence devices. Even so, a degree of caution is warranted, and there is no room for complacency.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of