In a city that is constantly changing, some residents are pushing back.
Plans to redevelop Jingu Gaien, a century-old park and sports center in central Tokyo, have met with stiff opposition from concerned citizens. In one of his final acts before his death in March, composer Ryuichi Sakamoto wrote to the governor opposing it.
Haruki Murakami, Japan’s most famous novelist, has spoken out against it, warning “once something is destroyed, it can never be restored.”
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
The 1.31km2 area is home to the Yakult Swallows baseball team, the city’s rugby pitch and about 2,000 trees, most notably a 300m row of gingko trees that is an unmistakable Tokyo landmark. In a joint project between Mitsui Fudosan Co, Itochu Corp, the Japan Sports Council and the landowners of Meiji Shrine, the project envisions knocking down and rebuilding the baseball and rugby pitches, switching their locations and constructing two new skyscrapers, along with communal spaces.
Opponents who want to preserve the site are livid, accusing the developers of putting profit ahead of residents. The backlash has made international headlines, perhaps because it feeds into narratives of a concrete-covered Japan. Most resistance has focused on the 700 trees that would be felled for the redevelopment.
First, some facts: The famous row of trees (which is what most people envision when they think of the vegetation there) would be preserved in its current form, though activists worry about potential damage to their roots. While some others would be cut down, the developers have pledged to increase the total to 1,998 by the end of the project by transplanting some and adding newer ones. The entire amount of green space would increase to 30 percent from the current 25 percent. So why the uproar? Chopping trees creates an emotional narrative, especially in a city going through a recent heatwave. Tokyo could use more greenery to combat the heat-island effect, so even a temporary loss feels concerning. Some of it stems from a perceived lack of consultation, particularly with those who do not live in the area. The developers’ move to share more information feels a little belated and needs to continue throughout the construction, but part of it also seems to stem from opposition to any change. As the city ages, or maybe just due to social media impact, redevelopment plans appear to be attracting foes. It seems these days that every aging building is sparking a campaign to save it.
However, the capital’s one constant is its never-ending change. If New York is the city that never sleeps, then Tokyo is the city that never stays the same.
“In Japan, there is less a culture of preserving old buildings,” the world-famous architect Tadao Ando said in 2006. “Japanese architecture is traditionally based on wooden structures that need renovating on a regular basis. Of course, we have since adopted concrete, steel and other durable materials, so the need to rebuild is no longer the same. But old habits die hard.”
Ando’s work is a great example. He was speaking then of the Doujunkai Aoyama Apartments, a block of modernist dwellings built in the 1920s and demolished in 2003 to make way for Ando’s Omotesando Hills mall. Opposed at the time, it is now seen as a signature work by one of the country’s great designers, and has become a crucial element in converting Omotesando into what it is now famous for — an elegant area where high-end shopping and architecture meet, such as New York’s Fifth Avenue or London’s Bond Street.
It is this lack of sentimentality and attachment to the past that has made Tokyo the world’s greatest city, or at least the most functional. Western visitors arriving post-COVID-19 pandemic are stunned to see how the city just ... works. No housing crisis or rental market inflation. Public transport is so functional that a stoppage on Monday on the capital’s key train line was the country’s top news story.
Ando explained that what was most important “was to save not the building itself, but the impression it made on the landscape.”
Tokyo’s best redevelopments do just that. Cries went up in 2015 over the redevelopment of the Hotel Okura; few complain anymore, as the new hotel is not only gorgeous, but keeps the feel of the original’s lobby, famously featured in a James Bond novel. In the 2000s, there was an outcry over the overhaul of the Shimokitazawa area; that has been a success, only improving on the area’s hipster charm. Disapproval would likely happen when the Imperial Hotel is torn down and rebuilt, beginning next year. (US architect Frank Lloyd Wright famously designed an earlier incarnation of the hotel before it was demolished in the late 1960s and replaced with the current version.)
Others mourn the loss of an iconic baseball field where Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig once played, worrying the change would drive fans away. The fears seem overblown. I lived in Hiroshima during the last years of the Hiroshima Carp’s beloved Municipal Stadium, located near the city’s famous Peace Park, before it was replaced by a new stadium elsewhere in the city. There was much upset then too, but the results are clear: Not only has the surrounding area been transformed, but average attendance at games has nearly doubled despite the stadiums having similar capacity. The Swallows’ ground is not without its charms, but it requires considerable modernization. Fitting with Ando’s philosophy, designs for the new stadium show they would preserve the feel of the existing facility, rather than creating a roofed field that would likely be more profitable.
Parts of the Jingu development do not seem perfect: I question the choice of an all-weather covered rugby stadium, even if it would become a venue for concerts, and I will mourn the loss of the grungy public batting center, which is not being replaced.
Residents being involved in these discussions is a good thing, but people should not veer from keeping developers honest to the not-in-my back-yard provincialism that has paralyzed so many Western cities, so rooted in the past they are unable to move into the present — think of the planning concerns that have choked homebuilding in the UK and elsewhere, even amid a housing crisis. Nor should people fall victim to the narrative of an inevitable decline — the idea that because of its aging and decreasing population Japan needs no more buildings: New places, ideas and even areas create an energy that refutes this assumption. Tokyo’s stock of incredible buildings and world-class public transport are only possible precisely because of its commitment to constant rebirth. Its beauty lies in the fact that it is ever-changing.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS