The most sought-after delicacy these days is flaky mooncakes with a filling of salted egg yolk created by master baker Chen Yao-hsun (陳耀訓).
Priced at NT$980 a box, the mooncakes are snapped up in 10 seconds on the Internet. Even with scalpers jacking up the price to NT$2,500, there are still buyers willing to exchange it with a far pricier, hard to get concert ticket, just to get their hands on the pastries.
In sharp contrast, Cheng Da (政大書城) bookstore has announced that it is turning its final page. The owner made the complaint that publishers usually sell books at 45 percent off the cover price to online bookstores, but only 32 percent off to brick-and-mortar bookstores. For new arrivals, bookstores usually offer customers a 21 percent discount. In this way, brick-and-mortar bookstores actually make extremely little profit.
However, aside from book prices, there are other reasons bookstores are struggling to stay afloat.
Many people now buy from online bookstores, while others acquire knowledge or search for information from the Internet without paying a cent. They are spared from worrying about the disposal of books or not finishing them afterward.
There are also people who borrow books from libraries. Once, I thought about borrowing a classic book from the library, assuming that it was not a popular one. I was surprised to find dozens of people were on the waiting list.
Another reason people are now turning their backs on books is the prevalence of pictures and images. People no longer wish to plow through texts and words to understand what the author is trying to say. Instead, they want instant gratification and to acquire knowledge with the most direct, swift and exciting method, which makes them consider reading plain, old, bulky books an unattractive activity.
As a result, numerous bookstores have been remodeled into restaurants, supermarkets, youth hostels and the like. Once, I visited a major bookstore in Taichung, but after it was renovated into a fusion cafe, only a few books were left as decoration. There are more people seeking a nice cup of coffee than a good book. Eslite’s Ximen store is a relevant case.
A while ago, a book would become a bestseller because it had a beautiful and chic cover design. Many people would buy it because they wanted to take a picture with the book and upload it to their social media. It seems that people are not the only ones who have an existential crisis.
I believe the book industry is long past its heyday. Cheng Da, a bookstore that insists on selling only books, has been in the red by NT$40 million for over four years. Even though I hate to see the bookstore go out of business, it would be unfair if it remained open, yet kept on losing money. The public might be able to buy it more time by purchasing books from it, but this is not feasible in the long run.
The wiser solution might be to call on the government to establish guidelines and regulations on publishers and selling parties’ trade. Another aspect that the government should address is large and external digital platforms using news and magazine content for free. They should share their profits with Taiwanese media outlets.
Modern life is stressful, and people would rather buy a flaky mooncake, a scoop of ice cream or a bowl of milkfish congee than purchase a book for the same price.
It is certain that people are falling out of love with reading: They are opting for pastries over fiction.
Jimmy Hsu is a farmer.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS