The US Senate on Tuesday unanimously passed legislation affirming its support for the initial trade agreement reached under the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade. The bill, which cleared the US House of Representatives on June 21, was passed by the US Senate and is to be sent to US President Joe Biden to be signed into law within 10 days.
The first agreement under the initiative covers the areas of customs administration and trade facilitation, good regulatory practices, services’ domestic regulation, fighting corruption and small and medium-sized enterprises.
Following the signing of the agreement, the two sides said they planned to begin negotiations on other, more complicated issues, such as agriculture, digital trade, labor, environmental and non-market policies and practices, and state-owned enterprises and standards.
Although the initiative is not a free-trade agreement, in that there were no adjustments to tariffs or import categories, the deal’s trade facilitation measures — which standardize and streamline the import and export process — would ensure substantial benefits and savings, fair market competition, public transparency and reduction of trade costs, while providing a legal foundation for further expanding bilateral trade ties.
The initiative could set Taiwan on the path to a sustainable economic future with a global outlook, pave the way for a free-trade agreement (FTA) and help with the country’s efforts to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
For the US, Taiwan is crucial not only for its contributions to semiconductors and supply chains. Bilateral trade and investment between the two countries can also create job opportunities for Washington. Only with cooperation based on the same values can there be a genuine win-win situation.
Taiwan and the UK are to begin official-level talks on an Enhanced Trade Partnership (ETP) in three key areas, with the aim of signing a memorandum of understanding. Minister Without Portfolio John Deng (鄧振中), who heads the Executive Yuan’s Office of Trade Negotiations, and British Minister of State for International Trade Nigel Huddleston announced the talks after a videoconference.
As Taiwan is an important trading partner for the UK, with bilateral trade reaching ￡8.6 billion (US$11 billion) last year, the two countries hope to enhance trade and investment ties while tackling market access issues. The ETP is to focus on two-way investment, digital trade, energy and net zero carbon emissions. It also aims to improve collaboration through annual trade talks, tackle barriers to trade and promote UK expertise, and in this way taking advantage of increasing commercial opportunities with the deepening of the UK-Taiwan relationship.
Since the UK has become a member of the CPTPP, the trade talks between the two can also give Taiwan an edge in joining the CPTPP. To further strengthen health cooperation between the UK and Taiwan, a memorandum of understanding on health cooperation was signed on July 7, which revealed warming relations between London and Taipei.
In addition, the UK issued a demarche to condemn China for violating the Sino-British Joint Declaration, underscoring the UK’s pivot to a hard-line stance in its relations with China in recent years, as Beijing tightened its control over Hong Kong.
The US’ and the UK’s increasing cooperation with Taiwan on trade is not only benefiting all parties economically, but, more importantly, it catalyzes Taiwan to establish closer ties with the global community.
However, China, which continues to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, expressed anger about the initiatives that could bring Taiwan substantial benefits, stating that: “Under the disguise of trade cooperation, the so-called ‘Initiative’ is just a US tool to rip Taiwan off. The [Democratic Progressive Party] authorities, driven by the selfish separatist agenda, have no scruples to betray Taiwan compatriots and businesses’ interests or sell Taiwan away. By signing the agreement, they are offering Taiwan to the US on a plate. This is the latest example of the US trying to fudge and hollow out the one-China principle.”
The less-than-friendly statements once again demonstrate that China views the West and Taiwan as nothing but its enemies.
The ballots in our hands are to determine whether Taiwan continues to partner with democratic countries and work for shared values that benefit both parties, or it shoots itself in the foot and throws its future away by tilting toward an autocratic country.
Hong Tsun-ming, who is originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS