The US Senate on Tuesday unanimously passed legislation affirming its support for the initial trade agreement reached under the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade. The bill, which cleared the US House of Representatives on June 21, was passed by the US Senate and is to be sent to US President Joe Biden to be signed into law within 10 days.
The first agreement under the initiative covers the areas of customs administration and trade facilitation, good regulatory practices, services’ domestic regulation, fighting corruption and small and medium-sized enterprises.
Following the signing of the agreement, the two sides said they planned to begin negotiations on other, more complicated issues, such as agriculture, digital trade, labor, environmental and non-market policies and practices, and state-owned enterprises and standards.
Although the initiative is not a free-trade agreement, in that there were no adjustments to tariffs or import categories, the deal’s trade facilitation measures — which standardize and streamline the import and export process — would ensure substantial benefits and savings, fair market competition, public transparency and reduction of trade costs, while providing a legal foundation for further expanding bilateral trade ties.
The initiative could set Taiwan on the path to a sustainable economic future with a global outlook, pave the way for a free-trade agreement (FTA) and help with the country’s efforts to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
For the US, Taiwan is crucial not only for its contributions to semiconductors and supply chains. Bilateral trade and investment between the two countries can also create job opportunities for Washington. Only with cooperation based on the same values can there be a genuine win-win situation.
Taiwan and the UK are to begin official-level talks on an Enhanced Trade Partnership (ETP) in three key areas, with the aim of signing a memorandum of understanding. Minister Without Portfolio John Deng (鄧振中), who heads the Executive Yuan’s Office of Trade Negotiations, and British Minister of State for International Trade Nigel Huddleston announced the talks after a videoconference.
As Taiwan is an important trading partner for the UK, with bilateral trade reaching ￡8.6 billion (US$11 billion) last year, the two countries hope to enhance trade and investment ties while tackling market access issues. The ETP is to focus on two-way investment, digital trade, energy and net zero carbon emissions. It also aims to improve collaboration through annual trade talks, tackle barriers to trade and promote UK expertise, and in this way taking advantage of increasing commercial opportunities with the deepening of the UK-Taiwan relationship.
Since the UK has become a member of the CPTPP, the trade talks between the two can also give Taiwan an edge in joining the CPTPP. To further strengthen health cooperation between the UK and Taiwan, a memorandum of understanding on health cooperation was signed on July 7, which revealed warming relations between London and Taipei.
In addition, the UK issued a demarche to condemn China for violating the Sino-British Joint Declaration, underscoring the UK’s pivot to a hard-line stance in its relations with China in recent years, as Beijing tightened its control over Hong Kong.
The US’ and the UK’s increasing cooperation with Taiwan on trade is not only benefiting all parties economically, but, more importantly, it catalyzes Taiwan to establish closer ties with the global community.
However, China, which continues to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, expressed anger about the initiatives that could bring Taiwan substantial benefits, stating that: “Under the disguise of trade cooperation, the so-called ‘Initiative’ is just a US tool to rip Taiwan off. The [Democratic Progressive Party] authorities, driven by the selfish separatist agenda, have no scruples to betray Taiwan compatriots and businesses’ interests or sell Taiwan away. By signing the agreement, they are offering Taiwan to the US on a plate. This is the latest example of the US trying to fudge and hollow out the one-China principle.”
The less-than-friendly statements once again demonstrate that China views the West and Taiwan as nothing but its enemies.
The ballots in our hands are to determine whether Taiwan continues to partner with democratic countries and work for shared values that benefit both parties, or it shoots itself in the foot and throws its future away by tilting toward an autocratic country.
Hong Tsun-ming, who is originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Rita Wang
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS