The US Senate on Tuesday unanimously passed legislation affirming its support for the initial trade agreement reached under the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade. The bill, which cleared the US House of Representatives on June 21, was passed by the US Senate and is to be sent to US President Joe Biden to be signed into law within 10 days.
The first agreement under the initiative covers the areas of customs administration and trade facilitation, good regulatory practices, services’ domestic regulation, fighting corruption and small and medium-sized enterprises.
Following the signing of the agreement, the two sides said they planned to begin negotiations on other, more complicated issues, such as agriculture, digital trade, labor, environmental and non-market policies and practices, and state-owned enterprises and standards.
Although the initiative is not a free-trade agreement, in that there were no adjustments to tariffs or import categories, the deal’s trade facilitation measures — which standardize and streamline the import and export process — would ensure substantial benefits and savings, fair market competition, public transparency and reduction of trade costs, while providing a legal foundation for further expanding bilateral trade ties.
The initiative could set Taiwan on the path to a sustainable economic future with a global outlook, pave the way for a free-trade agreement (FTA) and help with the country’s efforts to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
For the US, Taiwan is crucial not only for its contributions to semiconductors and supply chains. Bilateral trade and investment between the two countries can also create job opportunities for Washington. Only with cooperation based on the same values can there be a genuine win-win situation.
Taiwan and the UK are to begin official-level talks on an Enhanced Trade Partnership (ETP) in three key areas, with the aim of signing a memorandum of understanding. Minister Without Portfolio John Deng (鄧振中), who heads the Executive Yuan’s Office of Trade Negotiations, and British Minister of State for International Trade Nigel Huddleston announced the talks after a videoconference.
As Taiwan is an important trading partner for the UK, with bilateral trade reaching ￡8.6 billion (US$11 billion) last year, the two countries hope to enhance trade and investment ties while tackling market access issues. The ETP is to focus on two-way investment, digital trade, energy and net zero carbon emissions. It also aims to improve collaboration through annual trade talks, tackle barriers to trade and promote UK expertise, and in this way taking advantage of increasing commercial opportunities with the deepening of the UK-Taiwan relationship.
Since the UK has become a member of the CPTPP, the trade talks between the two can also give Taiwan an edge in joining the CPTPP. To further strengthen health cooperation between the UK and Taiwan, a memorandum of understanding on health cooperation was signed on July 7, which revealed warming relations between London and Taipei.
In addition, the UK issued a demarche to condemn China for violating the Sino-British Joint Declaration, underscoring the UK’s pivot to a hard-line stance in its relations with China in recent years, as Beijing tightened its control over Hong Kong.
The US’ and the UK’s increasing cooperation with Taiwan on trade is not only benefiting all parties economically, but, more importantly, it catalyzes Taiwan to establish closer ties with the global community.
However, China, which continues to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, expressed anger about the initiatives that could bring Taiwan substantial benefits, stating that: “Under the disguise of trade cooperation, the so-called ‘Initiative’ is just a US tool to rip Taiwan off. The [Democratic Progressive Party] authorities, driven by the selfish separatist agenda, have no scruples to betray Taiwan compatriots and businesses’ interests or sell Taiwan away. By signing the agreement, they are offering Taiwan to the US on a plate. This is the latest example of the US trying to fudge and hollow out the one-China principle.”
The less-than-friendly statements once again demonstrate that China views the West and Taiwan as nothing but its enemies.
The ballots in our hands are to determine whether Taiwan continues to partner with democratic countries and work for shared values that benefit both parties, or it shoots itself in the foot and throws its future away by tilting toward an autocratic country.
Hong Tsun-ming, who is originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS