The UK film industry revolves around the US’. The dependence is startling just in money terms: Of the nearly US$2.6 billion spent in film and television production in the UK in 2022, US studio-backed projects totaled US$1.36 billion — a 31 percent increase from 2021, according to the British Film Institute. Think of it another way: That rhapsody-in-pink Barbie Land set in last weekend’s blockbuster hit? It was built in the Warner Bros Studios in Leavesden, just north of London.
So, with Tinsel Town USA shut down by the dual strike by actors and writers, Hollywood-on-the-Thames has sputtered to a stop too. The knock-on effects are huge: There are more than 16,000 UK film and TV production companies, mostly small businesses, that in 2020 employed 86,000 people. While British actors have their own union — Equity — many work in productions shut down by walkouts staged by the Writers Guild of America (WGA) and the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Actors (SAG-AFTRA).
People can sense the anxiety when asking film folks here about their US cousins. “We’re hoping the parties resolve their differences soon,” said a spokesperson for Film London, which works with movie companies to set up shoots in the city. Equity is loudly supportive of the strike, but it reminds members that it is illegal to walk out in sympathy from British productions that have no investment from studios that are part of the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), the US trade association at loggerheads with the writers and actors’ unions.
However, the calamity also raises a tempting opportunity. Should the UK’s skilled film artisans — from actors and writers unaffiliated with US unions to the craftsmen and technicians who build and film extravaganzas such as Barbie — initiate independent productions that they can sell to US studios that might soon be content-starved? That kind of self-starting could help break British dependence on Hollywood financing (and US cinematic visions) — and revive an industry that once rivaled the US’. Indeed, if there is one place where the UK’s soft power has real potency, it is in the anglophilic offices of the big Hollywood studios. Anyway, the British are not up for the strikebreaker role. Everyone here simply says they hope it all blows over fast. At least in public.
However, there is talking going on. US producers have not been quiet. They were scouting for fresh sources even before the 160,000-member actors’ guild joined the WGA strike on July 14. The streaming companies know that overseas productions without big US studio money can come up with gigantic hits (think South Korea and Squid Game).
“Believe me, all conversations are happening,” said one Hollywood insider who asked not to be named because of the sensitivities surrounding the strike. “They’ve been happening in preparation for all this.”
An old-style Hollywood deal is also getting new traction — the so-called “negative pickup.” It’s one where no money exchanges hands until a movie or show is finished. The term originated in the period before digital, when the medium was really film, that is, celluloid — and moviemakers delivered the film negative to the studios. While the filmmakers got no money from the studio, a “negative pickup” in the past was enough to convince a bank to offer financing — the contract being an effective promissory note of money to come once the project was completed. The big studios usually promise to cover all costs and take on distribution (and, of course, the enormous proceeds from that).
That is all sotto voce for now — especially in the UK, where no one wants to damage existing relations with SAG-AFTRA. There is already criticism of potential “backdoor” use of London to circumvent the strike. If it ends soon, the damage would be limited, but the economic pressure on UK film businesses would grow as the US faceoff goes on.
Hollywood insiders do not expect any movement in negotiations until after the US Labor Day weekend in September, the unofficial beginning of fall in the US. Why then? It has little to do with producing fresh content. It is about maximizing the movies already in the pipeline. Fall marks the start of Hollywood’s awards season, when the studios roll out their biggest and most prestigious films. The producers would need the directors, writers and especially the actors who created those movies to promote them — and to juice the box office.
What is the point of the Oscars if the statuettes do not help to sell tickets? After all, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences — which gives out the annual prize — was set up by a studio chief, Louis B. Meyer, the founder of MGM. One raison d’etre: to circumvent unions by coddling actors with gilded trophies. It would be ironic if the awards got producers and actors back to the negotiating table.
It would be really bad news if the AMPTP decides to sacrifice the awards season. That means the standoff would become a war of attrition, but maybe then, the UK film industry might just decide it is time to strike out on its own.
Howard Chua-Eoan is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion covering culture and business. He previously served as Bloomberg Opinion’s international editor and is a former news director at Time magazine. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the