The UK indie rock band The 1975 have canceled their upcoming shows in Taiwan following nationwide outrage in Malaysia after vocalist Matty Healy kissed bass player Ross MacDonald during the Good Vibes music festival in Kuala Lumpur.
Protesting Malaysia’s anti-LGBTQ laws, Healy said: “I do not see the point of inviting The 1975 to a country and then telling us who we can have sex with.”
The band’s performance was cut short and the following day, the organizers announced that the Malaysian Ministry of Communications and Digital had canceled the festival.
Malaysia is a predominantly Muslim country, and government officials have openly spoken against LGBTQ communities on many occasions. In April 2014, Muhyiddin Yassin, who later served as Malaysian prime minister, publicly stated that LGBTQ is “poisoning the minds of Muslims with deviant practices.”
Homosexuality is illegal in Malaysia and punishable by up to 20 years in prison.
The 1975 was scheduled to play in Jakarta on Sunday and Taipei on Tuesday, but the band decided to cancel both concerts.
Homosexuality is not illegal in most provinces in Indonesia, except the highly conservative Aceh Province. However, LGBTQ communities are largely ostracized and shunned. Canceling the Jakarta concert was thus understandable, but canceling the one in Taipei is questionable.
Taiwan is one of the most liberal countries in Asia, and perhaps the most LGBTQ-friendly nation in the region. On May 24, 2019, Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage. The support for the LGBTQ community in Taiwan has continued to increase over the years. For many young people, being a supporter of the LGBTQ movement is considered an important aspect of their Taiwanese identity.
Taiwanese identity has been a long-debated topic that plays a defining role in cross-strait relations. Are they Taiwanese or Chinese, or both? Gradually, Taiwanese have formed a consensus that they are citizens of a democratic country that has achieved full autonomy.
I would argue that Taiwan’s political democratization is a catalyst for this identity formation, hence the popularity of the support for LGBTQ rights, often synonymous with liberal democracy and especially common among young Taiwanese.
Despite this, The 1975 still canceled their show in Taipei and without much explanation from the band, there is only speculation regarding the rationale behind this decision. Support for LGBTQ rights varies widely in Asia, but for the most part, LGBTQ topics are still considered taboo in most countries.
Countries like Taiwan, Japan, Thailand and Singapore have made significant progress by gradually recognizing LGBTQ individuals and securing their rights. On the other end of the spectrum, there are countries like Iraq and Afghanistan where LGBTQ rights are in constant decline, especially after the Taliban’s takeover.
Without prior research, it is easy to put all governments under one spectrum as being anti-LGBTQ.
From Healy’s protest about inviting The 1975 to a country and then “telling us who we can have sex with,” it can be concluded that he and the band attempted to promote an LGBTQ narrative at their concert. It is therefore counterproductive to cancel their concert in Asia’s most LGBTQ-friendly country.
Unfortunately, despite decades of effort and a progressive civil rights movement, to some groups, Taiwan still falls into the anti-LGBTQ Asian stereotype.
Patrick Kurniawan is a graduate student at National Chengchi University.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.