When I read the article “Schools should teach students about water safety” published in the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), it reminded me of my childhood. When I was little, I used to live in a small village by the sea. As there were no computers, mobile phones and other electronic products back then, my friends and I often went to the beach for fun during the summer holiday.
As a non-swimmer, I held on to a piece of polystyrene board and joined in the fun with the others. One day, a huge wave hit me, making me let go of the board. I was engulfed by the waves and at that moment, it was as if I saw death waving at me with its scythe.
Fortunately, I was not far from the shore, and a friend quickly noticed and pulled me out of the water, saving me from drowning. From then on, I was afraid of water. Whether it was the sea, river or lakes, I always gave them a wide berth.
Before the summer holiday begins, schools always repeatedly tell students to stay away from rivers and beaches over the holiday, but children being children never heed their teacher’s words.
As a splash in the water is exciting and can cool the heat of summer, children never take safety to heart.
This is where education steps in. Schools have been promoting water safety in recent years, while the government has been introducing students to the dangers of playing water sports aside from in swimming pools via forums, videos, class meetings and discussions.
Every student should be familiar with rescue and drowning prevention skills, which can be summarized in the mantra “shouting for help, calling 119, using long objects, throwing floating objects and using floats.”
At the same time, schools should issue water safety forms to inform parents of the dangerous spots in Taiwan and to remind them to prevent children from going to those areas for fun.
Overall, as a schoolteacher, I think schools have done ample in terms of water safety education.
As many students do not attend summer holiday tutorial courses and parents do not have time to plan their children’s summer schedule, the two-month summer break can be long. After students come back after the holiday, teachers notice that many of them show a significant drop in academic performance, manners and concentration, which we call the “slippery slope” effect.
Parents and schools must share the responsibility and cooperate to ensure the emotional and intellectual growth of children.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high schoolteacher.
Translated by Rita Wang
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself