The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office and the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau (MJIB) on Wednesday last week searched six military units and questioned suspects. On Friday they detained four retired military personnel and a diabolo instructor surnamed Lu (魯) on suspicion of forming a spy network for China. This case shows that China, which used to target senior military officers, has found a new way of infiltrating Taiwan: expanding recruitment to junior military personnel who have financial problems.
China has consistently launched espionage operations against Taiwan, with the aim of taking over the nation. These spy operations surged especially in 1987 when family members began being allowed to visit across the Strait and in 2008 with the opening of the “small three links” — direct postal, transportation and trade links between China and Taiwan.
The National Security Bureau (NSB) recorded at least 60 Chinese espionage cases from 2002 to 2017, and 42 of those were reported from 2009 to 2017. At least 44 cases were recorded by the MJIB from 2013 to 2019.
In the past decade, about 30 serving or retired Taiwanese military officers with the rank of captain or higher have been investigated and convicted of spying for China. Even a retired presidential security officer and a serving military police lieutenant colonel from the unit tasked with protecting the president were convicted for leaking sensitive information about President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) security to a Chinese intelligence agency.
The NSB estimates that there are about 5,000 Chinese spies in Taiwan. The Chinese espionage operations that have appeared in the news might be only the tip of the iceberg.
National security officers have said that Chinese intelligence agencies usually try to recruit Taiwanese for spying, mostly targeting high-ranking military and government officers using “honey traps” and financial incentives, or by gaining access to them through relatives and acquaintances or by befriending them on the Internet.
However, in last week’s case, the prosecutors’ office said that Lu was recruited by Chinese intelligence officers after retiring from the army. They allegedly offered him money to use his connections and friends to obtain classified materials and recruit others to form a spy network. Lu focused on pawnshops, money lenders and loan sharks near military bases to recruit more than 10 soldiers and officers who needed money or were having problems paying off their debts, offering them financial incentives for confidential information, the prosecutors’ office said.
It is of concern that even lower-ranking and junior officers are being targeted, while no Chinese intelligence personnel are detained or convicted in most spying cases. Another key issue is that China’s tactics are focused on “containing Taiwan with Taiwanese espionage.”
The Legislative Yuan in 2019 passed an amendment of the National Security Act (國家安全法) to raise the penalty for citizens who are recruited as spies. Those convicted face sentences of seven to 20 years in prison and a fine of NT$50 million to NT$100 million (US$1.6 million to US$3.19 million). Yet data from the High Prosecutors’ Office show that from 2014 to 2020, of the 137 people convicted as Chinese spies under the act, most were sentenced to six months in prison or less. The Institute for National Defense and Security Research has reported that the average punishment for those convicted of military espionage is 18 months in prison, nearly 13 times less than the average of 19 years in major European democracies and the US.
These lenient sentences impede efforts to deter spying. Besides the necessity of raising awareness among the public, legislative and judicial mechanisms should also be enhanced to ensure national security in Taiwan.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and