Taiwanese manufacturers are struggling to resist a double whammy of macroeconomic headwinds and mounting manufacturing costs from overseas production lines as the globalization of trade falls apart. The impact has deepened of late as most local companies found that they might be caught up in an “L-shaped” recovery, with a business rebound still up in the air.
Even large companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker with a 60 percent share of its addressable market, found it hard to resist the external environment’s adverse impact. The deterioration in the chipmaker’s revenue outlook offers a glimpse into the challenges and pain faced by local companies.
TSMC last week cut its revenue forecast for this year for the second time and projected that its revenue would dip about 10 percent from last year, rather than up to a 5 percent slump. The revision is unprecedented and rare, as business should have returned on track because customers are reducing their inventory to a healthy level this quarter, as TSMC has anticipated.
The chipmaker attributed the setback to persistently weak macroeconomy and a disappointing economic recovery in China, which depressed consumers’ demand for consumer electronics, from smartphones to PCs. China is the second-biggest market for TSMC, accounting for 12 percent of the chipmaker’s total revenue in the second quarter, down from 15 percent in the first quarter and 13 percent in the second quarter last year.
Aside from that, consumers are less willing to lavish on nonessential or big-ticket items amid soaring inflation and central bankers’ hikes of key interest rates to contain runaway consumer prices, the chipmaker said.
Under such an unfavorable business environment, TSMC said customers tend to be cautious about rebuilding inventory, and prefer to keep chip stock slim through the fourth quarter this year.
Even strong artificial-intelligence (AI) chips demand from Nvidia Corp and other chip designers cannot help TSMC fend off the macroeconomic headwinds and escape the first revenue decline in four years. TSMC expects the AI chip market to expand at an annual compound growth rate of 50 percent in a five-year period.
The firm last week also said it is expanding its global manufacturing footprint in response to customers’ request to boost supply resilience amid escalating geopolitical risks. TSMC counts Apple Inc as one of its major clients. The chipmaker is building a new, advanced factory in Arizona, but progress has lagged far behind its schedule.
TSMC last week postponed operating the Arizona fab to 2025, from the end of next year, due to a lack of skilled technicians to install manufacturing equipment. The firm said it has sent experienced technicians from Taiwan to train US workers, but it still cannot ramp up production of 4-nanometer chips as scheduled.
The firm has not also reached an agreement with the US on subsidies, which TSMC deems essential to help it “narrow the cost gap” through Washington’s Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) and Science Act. TSMC founder and former CEO Morris Chang (張忠謀) in March said that TSMC’s US fab cost was twice as expensive than its Taiwan fabs cost. Many semiconductor supply chain suppliers are reluctant to build new production lines in the US, as they are unable to overcome the pressure of high labor and operational costs.
In the past, local manufacturers benefited from globalization, and could make cost-effective components and devices for customers by leveraging factories in lower-labor cost countries. The tide has changed. As the US, the EU and Japan intend to build local supply chains, Taiwan’s manufacturers must allocate production to areas with higher manufacturing costs, and that lack a skilled and diligent workforce. Local companies require wisdom to solve the thorny problems of cost increases and tepid demand.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS