Taiwanese manufacturers are struggling to resist a double whammy of macroeconomic headwinds and mounting manufacturing costs from overseas production lines as the globalization of trade falls apart. The impact has deepened of late as most local companies found that they might be caught up in an “L-shaped” recovery, with a business rebound still up in the air.
Even large companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker with a 60 percent share of its addressable market, found it hard to resist the external environment’s adverse impact. The deterioration in the chipmaker’s revenue outlook offers a glimpse into the challenges and pain faced by local companies.
TSMC last week cut its revenue forecast for this year for the second time and projected that its revenue would dip about 10 percent from last year, rather than up to a 5 percent slump. The revision is unprecedented and rare, as business should have returned on track because customers are reducing their inventory to a healthy level this quarter, as TSMC has anticipated.
The chipmaker attributed the setback to persistently weak macroeconomy and a disappointing economic recovery in China, which depressed consumers’ demand for consumer electronics, from smartphones to PCs. China is the second-biggest market for TSMC, accounting for 12 percent of the chipmaker’s total revenue in the second quarter, down from 15 percent in the first quarter and 13 percent in the second quarter last year.
Aside from that, consumers are less willing to lavish on nonessential or big-ticket items amid soaring inflation and central bankers’ hikes of key interest rates to contain runaway consumer prices, the chipmaker said.
Under such an unfavorable business environment, TSMC said customers tend to be cautious about rebuilding inventory, and prefer to keep chip stock slim through the fourth quarter this year.
Even strong artificial-intelligence (AI) chips demand from Nvidia Corp and other chip designers cannot help TSMC fend off the macroeconomic headwinds and escape the first revenue decline in four years. TSMC expects the AI chip market to expand at an annual compound growth rate of 50 percent in a five-year period.
The firm last week also said it is expanding its global manufacturing footprint in response to customers’ request to boost supply resilience amid escalating geopolitical risks. TSMC counts Apple Inc as one of its major clients. The chipmaker is building a new, advanced factory in Arizona, but progress has lagged far behind its schedule.
TSMC last week postponed operating the Arizona fab to 2025, from the end of next year, due to a lack of skilled technicians to install manufacturing equipment. The firm said it has sent experienced technicians from Taiwan to train US workers, but it still cannot ramp up production of 4-nanometer chips as scheduled.
The firm has not also reached an agreement with the US on subsidies, which TSMC deems essential to help it “narrow the cost gap” through Washington’s Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) and Science Act. TSMC founder and former CEO Morris Chang (張忠謀) in March said that TSMC’s US fab cost was twice as expensive than its Taiwan fabs cost. Many semiconductor supply chain suppliers are reluctant to build new production lines in the US, as they are unable to overcome the pressure of high labor and operational costs.
In the past, local manufacturers benefited from globalization, and could make cost-effective components and devices for customers by leveraging factories in lower-labor cost countries. The tide has changed. As the US, the EU and Japan intend to build local supply chains, Taiwan’s manufacturers must allocate production to areas with higher manufacturing costs, and that lack a skilled and diligent workforce. Local companies require wisdom to solve the thorny problems of cost increases and tepid demand.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and