Let us imagine a situation where a man is dining at a restaurant. When he orders, he asks for something not spicy. Anything would do, just not spicy. The cook therefore randomly adds all kinds of seasonings in the dish, except chili peppers. The dish comes out sweet, salty and sour. Even some expired ingredients have been added to it. Would you like to try this dish? It is called the “non-green alliance.”
On the surface, it looks like all kinds of groups that oppose the pan-green camp can join and work together, but the alliance is actually a terrible hodgepodge. To put it more straightforwardly, the non-green alliance is rife with conflicts and contradictions between the groups of which it consists. Each group wants to take the lead and no one is willing to play second fiddle. The so-called non-green alliance might soon end up in a series of self-contradictions. Before the alliance has a chance to confront the pan-green camp, it might well start consuming itself.
With “non-green” in its name, the alliance should clarify why it is against the pan-green camp. If the non-green alliance is against “anti-communism” or against “anti-unification,” Taiwanese must express their opinions on these issues.
There are already some conflicts inside the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). It is difficult to say whether the KMT’s New Taipei City Mayor and presidential candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) can deal with all of the related challenges.
However, the KMT is still attempting to work with the white camp and collaborate with Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), and whose political attitude is unclear. The KMT is in disarray, and the situation might become even more chaotic.
From the perspective of the white camp, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has become the second favorite for the presidency. If Ko wanted to collaborate with someone and form an alliance, he would certainly think about asking Gou rather than Hou, given that Hou’s support rate has been the lowest among the three candidates. Obviously, although the KMT wants to work with the TPP, the effort of bringing the white and the pan-blue camps together appears to be very much a one-sided affair with regard to which party is putting in the most effort.
Be it blue, white or green, every political camp must propose its own concrete agendas to win over voters. A restaurant’s dish must be unique enough to attract customers, but no customer would allow a restaurant to serve a dish that has been cooked haphazardly. Similarly, voters would care about the content of each political camp, rather than agreeing with anything that is non-green.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS