In November 2021, it was reported that Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kao Chia-yu (高嘉瑜) had been abused by her then-boyfriend Raphael Lin (林秉樞). In October last year, Lin was sentenced to two years and 10 months in prison by the New Taipei City District Court. The sentence included eight months for bodily harm. Lin appealed the sentence, and although the High Court on July 3 dismissed his motion, he can still appeal the criminal charge of committing bodily harm.
Kao said that she did not sense any remorse from Lin, and that she would keep discussing domestic abuse and fighting for female victims who had experienced the same fate as her and are too afraid to speak out.
The indictment is proof that the judicial system works as a form of redress for victims, but more can be done. What matters to many victims is whether the abuser feel remorse. If a perpetrator is able to apologize and truly repent, they show a bright side of humanity. Only this way can they start to empathize with their victims and understand what they are going through. In doing so, the abuser would become less likely to commit a similar crime again, and the victims could heal and be comforted to a certain extent.
I have written about Lin’s antisocial traits. An antisocial person such as Lin has a ruthless personality. They disregard social norms, act impulsively and often assault others. Asking an antisocial person to repent and apologize is doomed to failure. Even if they do say that they are sorry, it is most likely that they are shedding crocodile tears.
When raising a child, everything must be done to prevent them from becoming antisocial. It is therefore extremely important to teach children to empathize with others and to have compassion for their suffering.
Wang Sou-jane is founding president of the Association of Taiwan Clinical Psychology.
Translated by Emma Liu
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals