Imagine trying to build a boat while it is already at sea and taking on water. You rush from springing leak to springing leak, haunted by a vague sense that a storm is coming, but with no idea of how big it would be or how long it would last.
This describes how the US is approaching the growing flood threat posed by a warmer atmosphere that holds more water, subjecting the country to bouts of torrential, catastrophic rainfall. Lives are being lost and property destroyed partly because we are moving too slowly to embrace proven solutions to bolster our infrastructure against disasters that are becoming increasingly routine.
Last week in Vermont and New York’s Hudson Valley, months’ worth of rain fell in hours, overwhelming antiquated water-management infrastructure, resulting in widespread flooding that took at least one life and wiped out roads, bridges, houses and more. Both places had experienced severe flooding before and had taken modest steps to avoid it. Those efforts proved woefully inadequate.
When most people think of the flood risk climate change poses, they picture hurricanes and rising oceans. However, a warmer planet also means more moisture in the air far from coasts. For every 1°C the atmosphere warms, it holds 7 percent more water vapor. The planet has already warmed 1.2°C above pre-industrial averages, and we are on track to add at least two more degrees on top of that.
This extra moisture often gets dumped out of the atmosphere in torrential downpours. Climate change was responsible for US$75 billion in flood damage in the US between 1988 and 2017, according to a 2021 study. That number is certainly higher now and could well rise exponentially soon.
Vermont was unlucky enough to bear the brunt of this effect last week. The state is often mentioned as a potential haven from climate change, author Jonathan Mingle wrote in the New York Times. As I have written, people keep learning the hard way that there are no climate refuges. People can be hundreds of miles from a wildfire and still choke on its smoke. And when climate hypercharges rain clouds, people do not even have to live near a river to experience flooding. “Localized” flooding, when so much water falls at once that drainage systems cannot handle it, is becoming as big a problem as the riverine variety.
So, every part of the country must be ready for deluges. Unfortunately, most of our infrastructure has been designed to withstand rainfall projections by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that are hopelessly obsolete. The NOAA’s models forecast rainfall using data from decades in the past, when climate change effects were minimal.
Thus, the agency’s idea of a once-per-century flooding event occurs far more frequently, a recent study by private research firm First Street Foundation shows.
The NOAA is trying to update its rain forecasts, but does not expect to finish that job until 2027. People do not have that kind of time. Billions of dollars are already being spent on infrastructure projects across the country, thanks to last year’s Infrastructure and Jobs Act, and most of the planning is based on the NOAA’s outdated projections. Thirteen million households live in unrecognized flood zones and lack flood insurance, First Street says.
Every part of the country at risk of riverine and localized flooding needs urgent and significant upgrades to at least three key defenses, said Alison Branco, climate adaptation director at the Nature Conservancy in New York:
Culverts: The pipes that divert water under roads and bridges are often too small and old to handle modern, climate-fueled deluges. Wetlands and floodplains: These natural sponges along riverbanks and in low-lying areas keep floodwaters out of places where people travel and congregate. People have developed and paved over too many of them, giving water nowhere to go. Rain gardens, thirsty landscaping and permeable pavement can help in smaller spaces. Storm-water management: Everything from street drains to wastewater pumping stations needs to be supersized for the storms to come. Bridges should be redesigned to trap less debris and let water flow.
None of this comes cheap. New York Governor Kathy Hochul recently pledged US$516 million to replace 140 bridges and dozens of culverts, but thousands more would need upgrading. Opening floodplains involves buying out homeowners. With Federal Emergency Management Agency assistance, Vermont has bought 154 homes since 2011. It might need to buy10,000 more to be on the safe side, Bloomberg News says. And upgrading water-management systems might be the most astronomical cost of all. New York City alone might need to spend US$100 billion on such a project.
However, people cannot let the size of the challenge keep overwhelming their capacity to solve it. Policymakers too often think in the short term, Branco says, driven by a narrow focus on cost-benefit analysis and the harsh logic of politics. “Let Me Kick You Out of Your Waterfront Property” makes a terrible campaign slogan.
However, the alternative is our current piecemeal approach, constantly cleaning up old messes and tinkering at the margins of a problem that grows bigger with every tonne of carbon people pump into the atmosphere.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. A former managing editor of Fortune.com, he ran the HuffPost’s business and technology coverage and was a reporter and editor for the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
c2023 Bloomberg L.P.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s