The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and prosecution reform group Saber Youth on June 17 held a seminar on fraud prevention. Rank-and-file prosecutors offered some suggestions that have drawn a range of reactions.
Some media reported that prosecutors identified the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), the National Communications Commission and the Ministry of Digital Affairs as “villains” in the “national fraud-fighting team” for not having taken adequate measures against fraud, but these reports seem to have misunderstood the seminar’s purpose.
As they shared their experience in handling fraud cases, the rank-and-file prosecutors made suggestions to the agencies that make up the “national fraud-fighting team” in the hope of strengthening and honing fraud control. They had no intention of “naming villains.”
Since the Executive Yuan implemented the next-generation anti-fraud action plan in July last year, it has been the liveliest in my 10 years as a prosecutor in terms of communication between prosecutors’ offices, and between ministries and departments.
During this time, the Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office has solicited rank-and-file prosecutors’ experience in handling fraud cases and has been quicker to propose solutions.
On July 25 last year, the Executive Yuan invited the FSC and other agencies to discuss countermeasures against third-party payment fraud. Three recommendations emerged from the meeting, including implementing third-party payment operators’ responsibility to “know your customer,” banks’ responsibility to “know your customer’s customer,” and improving the management and monitoring of virtual accounts.
In October last year, the FSC drew up a list of unusual transaction types for banks to keep an eye on, which has had initial success in fighting fraud.
A dilemma is that the public’s demand for financial, technological and communications convenience often runs counter to these regulatory measures, which tend to generate more lobbying and customer complaints, and restricts freedom. That means administrative agencies need additional understanding and support from the public. Prosecutors hope that the feedback they provide supports administrative agencies’ adoption and implementation of regulatory measures.
At the same time, regulations have not kept pace with the rapid growth and development of fraud syndicates as technology has advanced and caseloads have grown, leading to a dramatic rise in the burden that prosecutors have to deal with. It has also put more strain on the time and energy available for prosecutors to trace masterminds.
The ministry and the FSC responded promptly after the seminar by promising to bolster joint prevention, and introduce new measures to inspect and audit virtual accounts.
Newspaper reports say that the ministry is working on a mechanism to inform the public which third-party payment providers are in compliance with the law so that people can choose a legitimate provider. These measures are laudable, and establishing a positive evaluation mechanism would be good for the long-term development of the industry.
Prosecutors do not want public opinion to move in the direction of “naming villains” or of confrontation between ministries and departments.
Hopefully, prosecutors’ offices would collaborate with administrative agencies under the framework of the “national fraud-fighting team” so that the sparks that flew at the seminar can fuel the accelerated cooperation.
Cheng Tzu-wei is a prosecutor at the Ciaotou District Prosecutors’ Office in Kaohsiung.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s