The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and prosecution reform group Saber Youth on June 17 held a seminar on fraud prevention. Rank-and-file prosecutors offered some suggestions that have drawn a range of reactions.
Some media reported that prosecutors identified the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), the National Communications Commission and the Ministry of Digital Affairs as “villains” in the “national fraud-fighting team” for not having taken adequate measures against fraud, but these reports seem to have misunderstood the seminar’s purpose.
As they shared their experience in handling fraud cases, the rank-and-file prosecutors made suggestions to the agencies that make up the “national fraud-fighting team” in the hope of strengthening and honing fraud control. They had no intention of “naming villains.”
Since the Executive Yuan implemented the next-generation anti-fraud action plan in July last year, it has been the liveliest in my 10 years as a prosecutor in terms of communication between prosecutors’ offices, and between ministries and departments.
During this time, the Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office has solicited rank-and-file prosecutors’ experience in handling fraud cases and has been quicker to propose solutions.
On July 25 last year, the Executive Yuan invited the FSC and other agencies to discuss countermeasures against third-party payment fraud. Three recommendations emerged from the meeting, including implementing third-party payment operators’ responsibility to “know your customer,” banks’ responsibility to “know your customer’s customer,” and improving the management and monitoring of virtual accounts.
In October last year, the FSC drew up a list of unusual transaction types for banks to keep an eye on, which has had initial success in fighting fraud.
A dilemma is that the public’s demand for financial, technological and communications convenience often runs counter to these regulatory measures, which tend to generate more lobbying and customer complaints, and restricts freedom. That means administrative agencies need additional understanding and support from the public. Prosecutors hope that the feedback they provide supports administrative agencies’ adoption and implementation of regulatory measures.
At the same time, regulations have not kept pace with the rapid growth and development of fraud syndicates as technology has advanced and caseloads have grown, leading to a dramatic rise in the burden that prosecutors have to deal with. It has also put more strain on the time and energy available for prosecutors to trace masterminds.
The ministry and the FSC responded promptly after the seminar by promising to bolster joint prevention, and introduce new measures to inspect and audit virtual accounts.
Newspaper reports say that the ministry is working on a mechanism to inform the public which third-party payment providers are in compliance with the law so that people can choose a legitimate provider. These measures are laudable, and establishing a positive evaluation mechanism would be good for the long-term development of the industry.
Prosecutors do not want public opinion to move in the direction of “naming villains” or of confrontation between ministries and departments.
Hopefully, prosecutors’ offices would collaborate with administrative agencies under the framework of the “national fraud-fighting team” so that the sparks that flew at the seminar can fuel the accelerated cooperation.
Cheng Tzu-wei is a prosecutor at the Ciaotou District Prosecutors’ Office in Kaohsiung.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS