The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and prosecution reform group Saber Youth on June 17 held a seminar on fraud prevention. Rank-and-file prosecutors offered some suggestions that have drawn a range of reactions.
Some media reported that prosecutors identified the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), the National Communications Commission and the Ministry of Digital Affairs as “villains” in the “national fraud-fighting team” for not having taken adequate measures against fraud, but these reports seem to have misunderstood the seminar’s purpose.
As they shared their experience in handling fraud cases, the rank-and-file prosecutors made suggestions to the agencies that make up the “national fraud-fighting team” in the hope of strengthening and honing fraud control. They had no intention of “naming villains.”
Since the Executive Yuan implemented the next-generation anti-fraud action plan in July last year, it has been the liveliest in my 10 years as a prosecutor in terms of communication between prosecutors’ offices, and between ministries and departments.
During this time, the Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office has solicited rank-and-file prosecutors’ experience in handling fraud cases and has been quicker to propose solutions.
On July 25 last year, the Executive Yuan invited the FSC and other agencies to discuss countermeasures against third-party payment fraud. Three recommendations emerged from the meeting, including implementing third-party payment operators’ responsibility to “know your customer,” banks’ responsibility to “know your customer’s customer,” and improving the management and monitoring of virtual accounts.
In October last year, the FSC drew up a list of unusual transaction types for banks to keep an eye on, which has had initial success in fighting fraud.
A dilemma is that the public’s demand for financial, technological and communications convenience often runs counter to these regulatory measures, which tend to generate more lobbying and customer complaints, and restricts freedom. That means administrative agencies need additional understanding and support from the public. Prosecutors hope that the feedback they provide supports administrative agencies’ adoption and implementation of regulatory measures.
At the same time, regulations have not kept pace with the rapid growth and development of fraud syndicates as technology has advanced and caseloads have grown, leading to a dramatic rise in the burden that prosecutors have to deal with. It has also put more strain on the time and energy available for prosecutors to trace masterminds.
The ministry and the FSC responded promptly after the seminar by promising to bolster joint prevention, and introduce new measures to inspect and audit virtual accounts.
Newspaper reports say that the ministry is working on a mechanism to inform the public which third-party payment providers are in compliance with the law so that people can choose a legitimate provider. These measures are laudable, and establishing a positive evaluation mechanism would be good for the long-term development of the industry.
Prosecutors do not want public opinion to move in the direction of “naming villains” or of confrontation between ministries and departments.
Hopefully, prosecutors’ offices would collaborate with administrative agencies under the framework of the “national fraud-fighting team” so that the sparks that flew at the seminar can fuel the accelerated cooperation.
Cheng Tzu-wei is a prosecutor at the Ciaotou District Prosecutors’ Office in Kaohsiung.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS