The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) have again locked horns over the party’s decision to nominate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its presidential candidate.
The spat began when KMT Secretary-General Justin Huang (黃健庭) said that when it was in talks with Gou about the nomination in March, party representatives had offered him a “plan B” of first place on the party’s legislator-at-large list with an option to being legislative speaker.
Gou denied this, accusing Huang of tarnishing his image, peddling lies and distorting the situation.
Huang’s words were more likely an attempt to defuse the situation and demonstrate the KMT’s goodwill, but they had the opposite effect, and now Gou sounds like a jilted lover.
Commentators have asked whether the KMT has been bitten by a benefactor it has come to see as its cash cow. Is the KMT at fault? What does the spat say about Gou, his suitability as a potential political leader and the implications for the presidential race?
Gou has donated to previous KMT presidential campaigns and political events either through personal donations or his company, always within legally allowed limits to keep himself, his company and the KMT above criticism.
He has also become more politically active in the past few years, seeking the KMT presidential nomination on two occasions, in 2020 and this year. His attempts were frustrated both times.
Commentators have asked — some seriously, some with a degree of sarcasm — whether the party had treated its benefactor fairly, or whether it had just used him for campaign financing, perhaps dangling the prospect of the nomination.
It is unreasonable, indeed undemocratic and corrupt, for an individual — especially one who does not even have party membership — to expect special treatment in return for political donations, so that can be discounted as among Gou’s motivations.
When the KMT nominated Hou, many wondered how Gou would respond, but he said that he would fully support Hou’s campaign, as he wanted to see the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) removed from power.
Things changed when it became obvious that Hou’s campaign was foundering. Gou has started becoming more politically active in the past few days, criticizing the DPP’s record in government and announcing that he would attend a protest rally on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei on Sunday.
Former TVBS news anchor Lee Yen-chiou (李艷秋) wrote on Facebook that Gou had “already strung his bow,” predicting that he was preparing to announce plans to run as an independent.
Lee said that if Gou turned the election into a four-horse race, it would further hobble Hou, virtually securing a win for the DPP against a pan-blue vote split between Gou, Hou and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), the Taiwan People’s Party candidate, and potentially consigning the KMT to permanent opposition status.
No wonder the KMT is concerned about Gou’s behavior, leading to Huang’s recent comments.
Has the KMT been bitten by its cash cow? The relationship between Gou’s donations and the KMT’s obligations to him, when not clearly articulated, seem to have become a source of antipathy.
The party itself is guilty of nothing remarkable in political terms, but what does Gou’s reaction say about his understanding of how politics works, the thickness of his skin, his clear-headed conviction of how best to bring down the DPP government or his ability to keep a promise and maintain loyalty?
For this campaign, those questions would be answered by simply continuing to support Hou, as he promised to do in May.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for