A teenager killed by police in a Paris suburb. A wave of anger that morphs into widespread rioting and opportunistic looting. A tough law-and-order response followed by an appeal for unity and calm — and a political call for action that fades over time.
Such is the depressing deja vu cycle of violence over the years in the French banlieues, captured in movies such as La Haine and in news footage beamed around the world over the past week. These neighborhoods built up to house immigrant workers in the 1960s and 1970s have become bywords for deprivation, ethnic conflict and military-style police tactics — and, sadly, indifference.
It would take a lot of political willpower to make today’s cycle different from the last time violence flared up in 2005. The peak of rioting seems to have passed since a deployment of 45,000 law enforcement officers and Saturday’s funeral of French teenager Nahel, shot dead by a police officer on Tuesday last week. (Nahel’s last name was not released by authorities because he was a minor).
French President Emmanuel Macron has scrapped a state visit to Germany, recognizing this is no ordinary crisis: An estimated 100 million euros (US$109 million) of damage has been dealt to stores, shopping malls, banks and more.
The omens are not great for change. Macron has no parliamentary majority and has lost political capital pushing through divisive flagship pension reform — which created its own extraordinary cycle of violence that also postponed a state visit, this time from King Charles III.
Meanwhile, the far right — positioning itself as the party of law and order and small businesses — has never been more popular. It is reminiscent of the political fallout of 2005, when tough-talking then-French minister of the interior Nicolas Sarkozy built support for a presidential run by pledging to clean the “scum” from the streets.
An online survey by Le Figaro amid the riots showed far-right leader Marine Le Pen leading with 39 percent, six points ahead of Macron. The far left, which refused to call for calm, trailed. Macron’s former center-right prime minister, Edouard Philippe, remains popular.
How did we get here, and what to do about it? There are two aspects to the violence that need addressing: One is the spark — in this case, the bullet that ended Nahel’s life — and the other a powder keg of resentment, under-education and unemployment.
On the spark, policing needs real change and would benefit from a more community-minded model. France is different from the US — it has less firearm use, a smaller prison population and a wider social safety net. Its problems stem from a lack of oversight and a disconnect from those it protects.
The force fails to police itself: A 2016 report found that in 59 cases of lethal force used over a six-year period, only two had led to a legal action. Guardrails on curbing gun use have been eroded over time, said researcher Sebastien Roche of CNRS, the national research center, citing an increase in deaths at police hands after a 2017 counterterrorism law.
That so much policing in the banlieues involves militarized crowd control and identity checks paradoxically speaks to an under-resourced, poorly trained police force.
Clichy-sous-Bois, the epicenter of the 2005 riots, had no police station until 2010 despite a higher crime incidence. Talk of color-blind republican values clashes with the evidence of numerous testimonials.
Michel Zecler, a black music producer who was badly beaten by police in his Parisian studio, told me about it in 2021.
“Don’t tell me there’s no police racism after what I went through,” he said.
As for the social powder keg, the ghettoization of rich and poor in France has persisted even as income inequality is kept low by large-scale state redistribution. Access to public services is uneven: The flip side of police shortages in the banlieues are education shortcomings. Teachers turn over at a higher rate, and discrimination persists into employment.
Paris has boomed while its environs have stagnated. Trappes Mayor Ali Rabeh calls it a “total failure of the republic.”
Inflation and COVID-19 have made things worse. Dozens of local counselors in May warned that the banlieues were in an emergency situation as higher building costs stalled vital renovation projects, rent payments went unpaid and uneven healthcare resources exposed by the pandemic had left scars.
Regeneration is seen as key to better housing, quality of life and security. Studies suggest these are neighborhoods where people’s walking speed is double that measured in other, more pleasant towns.
Alexis de Tocqueville once wrote that every generation is a new people. The young age of rioters — with an average age of 17 — suggests a people in danger of being lost. The viral video of a father dragging his son from the streets at night and throwing him into the trunk of his car was a poignant reminder of the high number of single-parent families struggling to keep control.
A woeful lack of daycare in the area adds to families’ vulnerability. Opening more kindergartens was one of 31 ideas proposed by think tank Institut Montaigne last year to revive the banlieues.
There is no magic bullet, and a lot of the violence would make some solutions even harder to accomplish — infrastructure for next year’s Olympic Games, seen as key to regenerating poor neighborhoods, has been damaged. Macron is running out of time to keep his promises to the younger generation he claims to represent — and to avoid another case of urban violence deja vu.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering digital currencies, the EU and France. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS