It is happening again. In Darfur, scene of a genocide that killed 300,000 people and displaced millions 20 years ago, armed militias are on the rampage once more. Now, as then, they are targeting ethnic African tribes, murdering, raping and stealing with impunity.
“They” are nomadic, ethnic Arab raiders, the much-feared “devils on horseback” — except now they ride in trucks. They are called the Janjaweed, and they are back.
How is it possible such horrors can be repeated? The world condemned the 2003 slaughter. The UN and the International Criminal Court (ICC) investigated. Former Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir was charged with genocide and crimes against humanity along with his principal allies. The trial of one suspect, known as Ali Kushayb, opened last year. Yet al-Bashir and the guilty have evaded justice so far.
Illustration: mountain people
It is a familiar story. Throughout history, genocide, the most heinous of crimes, has often gone unpunished. The UN’s 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide defined it as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.” It is universally proscribed. States are legally bound to prevent it. Yet there is a tendency to look away. In Xinjiang, Myanmar and elsewhere, the convention’s “odious scourge” rages unchecked.
For its part, Sudan goes from bad to worse. The Janjaweed are allied to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) — paramilitaries warring with the army for control of the country. RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, better known as Hemedti, was a Janjaweed leader in 2003. Like others, he has never faced justice.
The UN warns with growing urgency that “crimes against humanity” are being committed in Darfur. It seems only too obvious where this is headed.
Genocide, typically, is a “never again” event. So terrible and long-lasting are its effects that survivors insist it cannot ever be repeated. The Holocaust — the murder of 6 million European Jews by Nazi Germany — is the supreme, modern example of genocidal evil. Yet even that abomination has not dispelled a more general amnesia (or deliberate forgetting) about the past, nor deterred present-day emulators.
“Never again” never works.
The denial of recognition and justice to genocide’s historical victims helps explain today’s political and moral blind spots. In a powerful essay in the New York Review of Books last month, Ed Vulliamy, a former Guardian and Observer Bosnian war correspondent, highlights one such case of “invisibility”: the 19th-century drive to exterminate California’s Native American tribes.
“They were totally deprived of land rights. They were ... treated as wild animals, shot on sight ... enslaved and worked to death... Their life was outlawed and their whole existence was condemned,” an official report later said.
Nowhere were efforts to destroy indigenous peoples’ lives and culture more “methodically savage” than in California, Vulliamy wrote.
Yet who remembers now? Who even knew?
To his credit, California Governor Gavin Newsom has sponsored the California Truth and Healing Council to collect descendants’ testimony and formulate proposals for recognition, recompense and restorative justice.
Newsom is clear about what happened.
“It’s called genocide... No other way to describe it,” he said when setting up the council.
Such candor is rare.
Most European states, Britain especially, formerly exhibited genocidal tendencies. Australia, too.
The genocide of the Herero, Nama and other indigenous peoples by early 20th-century German settlers in what is now Namibia is another instance of obliterated history recently brought painfully to light. Thousands were machine-gunned by the colonists. Pornographic photographs of sexually abused women were sent home as postcards. Foreshadowing Nazi atrocities, macabre medical experiments were conducted on prisoners.
In 2021, a belatedly apologetic Germany agreed reparations with Namibia’s government, but the deal is on hold. Victims’ groups object, saying they were not consulted. As in other historical genocides, like that suffered by Ottoman-era Armenians in 1915-17, facts are disputed, responsibility is repudiated and reconciliation remains elusive. Referred pain is just too powerful.
Genocide prosecutions make gradual advances. Last week, a court in Paris jailed for life a Rwandan military police officer, Philippe Hategekimana, for his role in the slaughter of 800,000 people, mostly minority ethnic Tutsis, in 1994. Following the Bosnian war, former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic and the Bosnian Serb leaders, Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, were tried for genocide.
However, national courts in Germany and France exercising “universal jurisdiction,” the much-undermined ICC (the US, Russia and China reject its authority), special courts (as in Sierra Leone) and ad hoc, Yugoslavia-style international tribunals, such as that urged for Ukraine, are struggling to keep up with the sheer scale of atrocious behavior around the world.
Why, for example, is Syrian President Bashar al-Assad not prosecuted for attempted genocide of Kurdish and Sunni groups under the terms of the 1948 convention? Russian President Vladimir Putin should surely face similar action over Ukraine — in addition to the ICC’s war crimes warrant. Last week’s pizza restaurant bombing in Kramatorsk could be exhibit A, although in truth there are not enough letters in the alphabet to list all Putin’s crimes.
Treating genocide as a rare, usually historical occurrence is nonsense. It is happening today in Darfur. It is happening in Myanmar, where minority Rohingyas are persecuted and displaced by a vicious military junta. It is happening in China with the documented mass detention, forced labor, involuntary sterilization, family separation and religious persecution of Uighurs in Xinjiang.
As the US government says, such cruelty exactly fits the definition of genocide with intent. So why not indict Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)? The UN Human Rights Council’s shameful vote to ignore its own damning Xinjiang investigation shows why this suggestion is impractical to the point of absurdity. It shows the depth of the problem with genocide denialism that the world still faces.
It is why impunity rules. It is why the killers keep killing. It is why the Janjaweed ride again.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
RSS