Late last month, the Cabinet approved a proposed subsidy plan and complementary measures to narrow the tuition gap between public and private universities. It was one of the quickest and most positive decisions made by the government in recent years to address the difficulty of getting higher education in Taiwan.
Since its announcement, the subsidy has been welcomed by schools, students and parents in general.
However, Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) seems to have a different view on this. He said that if the subsidy was really necessary, why not launch it at the start of the school year in September? Questioning the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s intention, he asked if its implementation was being delayed to February next year, after the presidential election in January, to imply that there would be no subsidy unless the public voted for the DPP.
The truth is, there are rules regarding budgeting and execution.
Article 46 of the Budget Act (預算法) states: “The general budget proposal of the central government, subordinate unit budget and its consolidated table shall, after a decision is made by the Executive Council of the Executive Yuan, be turned over to the central budget accounting and statistics agency for compilation and, along with the policy implementation plan, submitted by the Executive Yuan to the Legislative Yuan for its review four (4) months before the beginning of the fiscal year.”
The subsidy plan, which aims to help disadvantaged students, is a new plan that requires an annual budget of NT$21.9 billion (US$703 million). Naturally, it should follow budgeting procedures, and be included in the government’s budget plan for the next fiscal year. If it is passed in the legislature at the end of this year, the earliest time for its implementation is February next year, when a new semester begins.
Ko’s comments that the plan should be launched in September when the next semester begins are just absurd in terms of budgeting. After serving as Taipei mayor for eight years, it is surprising that the presidential hopeful is so unfamiliar with budgeting.
As for his claim that there would be no subsidy if the public does not vote for the DPP, we should not waste our time on such political drivel. As long as a university student meets the requirements for the subsidy, they should benefit from the policy, which has nothing to do with party or voting preference. Ko does not need to fret about this.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS