Late last month, the Cabinet approved a proposed subsidy plan and complementary measures to narrow the tuition gap between public and private universities. It was one of the quickest and most positive decisions made by the government in recent years to address the difficulty of getting higher education in Taiwan.
Since its announcement, the subsidy has been welcomed by schools, students and parents in general.
However, Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) seems to have a different view on this. He said that if the subsidy was really necessary, why not launch it at the start of the school year in September? Questioning the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s intention, he asked if its implementation was being delayed to February next year, after the presidential election in January, to imply that there would be no subsidy unless the public voted for the DPP.
The truth is, there are rules regarding budgeting and execution.
Article 46 of the Budget Act (預算法) states: “The general budget proposal of the central government, subordinate unit budget and its consolidated table shall, after a decision is made by the Executive Council of the Executive Yuan, be turned over to the central budget accounting and statistics agency for compilation and, along with the policy implementation plan, submitted by the Executive Yuan to the Legislative Yuan for its review four (4) months before the beginning of the fiscal year.”
The subsidy plan, which aims to help disadvantaged students, is a new plan that requires an annual budget of NT$21.9 billion (US$703 million). Naturally, it should follow budgeting procedures, and be included in the government’s budget plan for the next fiscal year. If it is passed in the legislature at the end of this year, the earliest time for its implementation is February next year, when a new semester begins.
Ko’s comments that the plan should be launched in September when the next semester begins are just absurd in terms of budgeting. After serving as Taipei mayor for eight years, it is surprising that the presidential hopeful is so unfamiliar with budgeting.
As for his claim that there would be no subsidy if the public does not vote for the DPP, we should not waste our time on such political drivel. As long as a university student meets the requirements for the subsidy, they should benefit from the policy, which has nothing to do with party or voting preference. Ko does not need to fret about this.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS