As New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, now has former KMT secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) on his campaign team, Hou seems to have had a change of tactic. Currently ranking at the bottom of the polls, he appears intent on turning the tide with his policy rollout.
For one, when Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, proposed retaining the shuttered reactors of the nation’s third nuclear power plant in Ma-anshan (馬鞍山), Pingtung County, in case of an emergency, Hou promptly and, without thinking of its feasibility, promised to keep all four nuclear power plants. He said he would reactivate the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant, the nation’s first plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門), restart construction of the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in the city’s Gongliao District(貢寮), and keep the second plant in the city’s Wanli District (萬里) and the third one in operation.
However, state-run utility Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) questioned Hou’s policy on nuclear power. It said the first plant was forced to shut down before its 40-year license expired, because it did not have room to store new spent fuel. Hou also conveniently forgot that it was the New Taipei City Government that had refused to issue a license for a dry-cask storage facility that would have served as an interim solution for storing spent fuel.
Furthermore, Hou has shifted from prevarication to full endorsement of the so-called “1992 consensus.” He said that, if elected president, he would reinstate a shorter four-month compulsory military service. Hou’s series of policy U-turns have only made him look like he is grasping at straws.
The four-month compulsory military service was a blatant attempt by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to court supporters. During these four months, draftees spend most of the time training and yet do not possess any combat readiness or the competency to carry out missions in the event of warfare. They are then discharged just as they are getting into stride. The military has become a camp that is always training newcomers, which could undermine the combat power of professional armed forces.
About 30 years ago, I trained to be a reserve officer during my compulsory military service. Setting aside the time of training at Taichung’s Chenggong Ling (成功嶺) military training camp and Fuxinggang (復興崗) military academy, as well as some in practice training with the troops, I actually did less than one-and-a-half years for my military service. From learning the ropes to settling in, by the time I found my bearings, conscription was almost over. I remember my supervisors lamenting about how things were just getting on track and it was time to say goodbye. If two years of conscription was not enough, what can four months of military conscription achieve?
As the sub-replacement fertility rate worsens and cross-strait tensions escalate, the government’s reinstatement of compulsory military service to one year has not been an easy choice, but a measure of necessity.
If Hou wishes to appeal to young people by changing military service back to four months, perhaps he can also throw in other self-defeating measures such as abolishing the conscription system and giving up on arms purchases. In other words, would it not be easier to just raise the white flag to the Chinese Communist Party?
Chung Pang-yu is an adjunct assistant professor at National Kaohsiung Normal University’s department of education.
Translated by Rita Wang
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant
RSS