New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate currently trailing in the polls, earned himself a new nickname after an event at the Huang Fu-hsing (黃復興) military veterans’ branch in Kaohsiung on Saturday last week.
Hou was seated next to former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the party’s 2020 presidential candidate, as a show of unity to bolster Hou’s flagging campaign. Several commentators focused on how Han apparently used any opportunity to move his chair away from Hou, only for Hou to pull it closer when Han stood up to go to the podium. Hou’s name is homophonous with the phrase “Hou moved [it]” (侯有移) in Chinese; hence the new nickname.
The name is born of a frivolous observation, and yet it is remarkably appropriate given how Hou has moved his position in the past few days on significant policy positions: his views on nuclear power plants and national defense in particular.
As New Taipei City deputy mayor, Hou had called for the scheduled decommissioning of the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in the city’s Shihmen District (石門) and the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in the city’s Wanli District (萬里) before 2018. As mayor, he voted against the party line, opposing restarting construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮) in the December 2021 referendums.
His position then was at least consistent. He was concerned about the safety of the aging plants and the lack of safe storage for spent nuclear fuel rods. His willingness to vote against the party line was admirable, and contributed to his image of being willing to do the right thing irrespective of partisan loyalties.
Hou’s about-face comes just as the International Atomic Energy Agency concluded it is safe for Japan to release treated wastewater originally contaminated by the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant meltdown more than 12 years ago, a reminder of the dangers of nuclear power plants in earthquake zones.
Hou’s comments that he would revert to a four-month mandatory military service, reversing the government’s decision to extend it to a full year, are also concerning, because of the implications for Taiwan’s ability to defend itself, as well as the message such a decision would send to allies mulling whether they would come to Taiwan’s aid should the Chinese Communist Party order an invasion.
What could have changed Hou’s mind? His low opinion poll ratings and the need for support within party ranks, with pressure to conform more closely to traditional KMT policy positions, might go some way to explaining it.
The KMT, aware that Hou is losing the race, just ratcheted up its support. A meeting with Han was arranged, despite the clearly frosty dynamic between the two men. Yesterday, former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) reiterated his backing.
Most significant, perhaps, was former KMT secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) joining Hou’s campaign team. King was former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) right-hand man. After King joined the campaign, Hou suddenly moved closer to policy positions remarkably similar to those of the Ma administration.
Hou’s concerns for a stable energy mix are legitimate, but why fall back to aging, semi-dismantled or mothballed old technology? Other countries, including the US, the UK, China and Russia, are moving to next-generation small modular-reactor technology that would be safer and far more appropriate for Taiwan’s earthquake-prone environment. Would it hurt the KMT to have vision rather than fall back on Ma’s old positions? And why revert to the four-month military service and lack of preparedness?
Voters have already given their verdict on Ma’s failed policies. Hou should move on.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS