To clear Taiwan’s dishonor of being a “living hell for pedestrians,” the Ministry of Transportation and Communications has pulled out all the stops to ensure that drivers give right of way to pedestrians at intersections.
Although the legislation was established to create a more pedestrian-friendly environment, it has received unexpected criticism since its implementation. One of the biggest complaints is the “emperor complex” of pedestrians: No matter what they do, whether it be crossing on a red light or deliberately loitering on the crosswalk, drivers always have to give way to them or face a fine of NT$6,000.
“Pedestrians come first” is the iron rule in ensuring pedestrians’ safety.
However, as road traffic safety should be observed by pedestrians and drivers, it is not fair to establish legislation that favors pedestrians.
A while ago, at the intersection of Fuxing N Road and Nanjing E Road, a man was reportedly “lost in reverie” on the crosswalk, preventing vehicles from turning right for up to 15 seconds, and people lambasted him for intentionally making a nuisance of himself.
Before traffic safety and mobility is improved at intersections, a better solution might be to make a clear distinction between pedestrian signals and right or left signals, so that pedestrians and drivers have guidance, as well as a benchmark for traffic contraventions.
Otherwise, as long as there is a pedestrian on the crosswalk, all vehicles need to stop at a distance of at least 3m. Even when pedestrians cross on a red light, drivers still need to yield to them. This kind of overcorrection has caused people to question the purpose of traffic signals under such circumstances.
Feasibility, validity and impartiality are central to any legislation. Just as the idiom “If a prince violates the law, he must be punished like an ordinary person” underscores impartiality, it is unjust to mete out strict penalties to drivers who do not yield, and give pedestrians crossing on a red light a mere slap on the wrist.
Accidents happen for many reasons, whether it be heavy traffic, badly designed intersections or vehicles breaking down, but the key still lies with drivers. Neglect, carelessness and speeding are all common reasons for accidents.
As a result, having drivers follow traffic rules and develop safe driving habits in a bid to ensure everyone’s safety is the most important priority. Meting out heavy penalties treats the symptoms not the problem and causes unnecessary public anger.
The ministry has of late been relying on enforcing the speed limit enforcement and traffic cameras to force drivers to adhere to the traffic safety rules, yet statistics show that there has been no reduction in the number of traffic casualties and accidents.
If the government wants people to follow traffic rules, it must first ensure that there is appropriate road planning, adequate parking spaces and a reasonable speed limit.
However, by setting up speed cameras and traffic enforcement cameras, and conducting average speed enforcement the government is treating citizens like criminals. It is little wonder that citizens do not voluntarily observe traffic laws.
In the Wanli period during China’s Ming Dynasty, academic and official Lu Kun (呂坤) gave profound insight into the stringent laws made by the court.
He said, to establish an unchanging law due to an occasional event, and to make the entire people suffer to punish one person’s mistake is the root of the problem with a malignant law.
Given the government’s overreliance on traffic enforcement cameras and the forced implementation of a problematic law, perhaps this insight hits closer to home than ever.
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS