To clear Taiwan’s dishonor of being a “living hell for pedestrians,” the Ministry of Transportation and Communications has pulled out all the stops to ensure that drivers give right of way to pedestrians at intersections.
Although the legislation was established to create a more pedestrian-friendly environment, it has received unexpected criticism since its implementation. One of the biggest complaints is the “emperor complex” of pedestrians: No matter what they do, whether it be crossing on a red light or deliberately loitering on the crosswalk, drivers always have to give way to them or face a fine of NT$6,000.
“Pedestrians come first” is the iron rule in ensuring pedestrians’ safety.
However, as road traffic safety should be observed by pedestrians and drivers, it is not fair to establish legislation that favors pedestrians.
A while ago, at the intersection of Fuxing N Road and Nanjing E Road, a man was reportedly “lost in reverie” on the crosswalk, preventing vehicles from turning right for up to 15 seconds, and people lambasted him for intentionally making a nuisance of himself.
Before traffic safety and mobility is improved at intersections, a better solution might be to make a clear distinction between pedestrian signals and right or left signals, so that pedestrians and drivers have guidance, as well as a benchmark for traffic contraventions.
Otherwise, as long as there is a pedestrian on the crosswalk, all vehicles need to stop at a distance of at least 3m. Even when pedestrians cross on a red light, drivers still need to yield to them. This kind of overcorrection has caused people to question the purpose of traffic signals under such circumstances.
Feasibility, validity and impartiality are central to any legislation. Just as the idiom “If a prince violates the law, he must be punished like an ordinary person” underscores impartiality, it is unjust to mete out strict penalties to drivers who do not yield, and give pedestrians crossing on a red light a mere slap on the wrist.
Accidents happen for many reasons, whether it be heavy traffic, badly designed intersections or vehicles breaking down, but the key still lies with drivers. Neglect, carelessness and speeding are all common reasons for accidents.
As a result, having drivers follow traffic rules and develop safe driving habits in a bid to ensure everyone’s safety is the most important priority. Meting out heavy penalties treats the symptoms not the problem and causes unnecessary public anger.
The ministry has of late been relying on enforcing the speed limit enforcement and traffic cameras to force drivers to adhere to the traffic safety rules, yet statistics show that there has been no reduction in the number of traffic casualties and accidents.
If the government wants people to follow traffic rules, it must first ensure that there is appropriate road planning, adequate parking spaces and a reasonable speed limit.
However, by setting up speed cameras and traffic enforcement cameras, and conducting average speed enforcement the government is treating citizens like criminals. It is little wonder that citizens do not voluntarily observe traffic laws.
In the Wanli period during China’s Ming Dynasty, academic and official Lu Kun (呂坤) gave profound insight into the stringent laws made by the court.
He said, to establish an unchanging law due to an occasional event, and to make the entire people suffer to punish one person’s mistake is the root of the problem with a malignant law.
Given the government’s overreliance on traffic enforcement cameras and the forced implementation of a problematic law, perhaps this insight hits closer to home than ever.
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS