Ever since ChatGPT went viral last fall, companies have touted many ways artificial intelligence can make our lives easier. They have promised superhuman virtual assistants, tutors, lawyers and doctors.
What about a superhuman chemical engineer?
London-based startup Orbital Materials would like to create just that. The startup is working to apply generative AI — the method behind tools such as ChatGPT — expressly for accelerating the development of clean energy technologies. The idea is to make computer models powerful and sharp enough to identify the best formulas for products such as sustainable jet fuel or batteries free of rare-earth minerals.
Illustration: Yusha
Orbital Materials cofounder Jonathan Godwin imagines a system that is as accessible and effective as the software that engineers use today to model designs for things such as airplane wings and household furniture.
“That, historically, has just been too difficult for molecular science,” he said.
ChatGPT works because it is adept at predicting text — here is the next word or sentence that makes sense. For the same idea to work in chemistry, an AI system would need to predict how a new molecule would behave, not just in a lab, but in the real world.
Several researchers and companies have deployed AI to hunt for newer, greener materials. Symyx Technologies, a materials discovery company formed in 1990s, wound down after a sale. Newer companies have gained traction making petrochemical alternatives and programming cells.
Still, for many materials needed to decarbonize the planet, the technology is not there yet.
It can take decades for a new advanced material to move from discovery to the market. That timeline is way too slow for the businesses and nations looking to rapidly cut emissions as they race to meet net zero targets.
“That needs to happen in the next 10 years, or sooner,” said Aaike van Vugt, co-founder of material science startup VSParticle.
AI researchers think they can help. Before launching Orbital Materials, Godwin spent three years researching advanced material discovery at DeepMind, Google’s AI lab. That lab released AlphaFold, a model to predict protein structures that could speed up the search for new drugs and vaccines. That, coupled with the rapid takeoff of tools such as ChatGPT, convinced him that AI would soon be capable of conquering the material world.
“What I thought would take 10 years was happening in a matter of 18 months,” he said. “Things are getting better and better and better.”
Godwin compares his method with Orbital Materials to AI image generators like Dall-E and Stable Diffusion. Those models are created using billions of online images, so that when users type in a text prompt, a photorealistic creation appears. Orbital Materials plans to train models with loads of data on the molecular structure of materials. Type in some desired property and material — say, an alloy that can withstand very high heat — and the model spits out a proposed molecular formula.
In theory, this approach is effective because it can both imagine new molecules and measure how they would work, said Rafael Gomez-Bombarelli, an assistant professor at the Minnesota Institute of Technology (MIT), who advised Orbital Materials. (He said he is not an investor.)
Right now, many tech investors are prowling for companies that can turn a profit by improving greener material production. That is particularly the case in Europe, where regulators are forcing manufacturers to lower carbon emissions or face stiff fines. The markets for advanced materials in sectors like renewable energy, transportation and agriculture are set to grow by tens of billions of dollars in the coming years.
Researchers, such as those at the University of Toronto, have set up “self-driving labs” that pair AI systems with robots to search for new materials at unparalleled speeds. Dutch startup VSParticle makes machinery used to develop components for gas sensors and green hydrogen.
Think of it like a DNA sequencer in a genomics lab, said co-founder Van Vugt, who believes his equipment can help shorten the 20-year time horizon of advanced materials to one year, and, eventually, “a couple of months.” His company is currently raising investment capital.
Orbital Materials, which raised US$4.8 million in previously undisclosed initial funding, is planning to start with turning its AI gaze toward carbon capture. The startup is working on an algorithmic model that designs molecular sieves, or tiny pellets installed within a device that can sift carbon dioxide and other noxious chemicals from other emissions, more efficiently than current methods. (Godwin said the startup, which has several AI researchers, plans to publish peer-reviewed results on this tech soon.) Carbon capture has failed to work at scale to date, though thanks to a slew of government incentives, particularly in the US, interest in deploying the technology is rapidly ramping up.
Eventually, Godwin said Orbital Materials would like to move into areas such as fuel and batteries. He imagines mirroring the business model of synthetic biology and drug discovery companies: Develop the brainpower, then license out the software to manufacturers.
However, getting the AI right is only half the battle. Actually making advanced materials in areas such as battery and fuel production requires working with huge incumbent enterprises and messy supply chains. This can be even costlier than developing new drugs, MIT’s Gomez-Bombarelli said.
“The economics and de-risking make it just way harder,” he said.
Heather Redman, a managing partner with Flying Fish Partners, which backed Orbital Materials, said most tech investors chasing the shiny penny of generative AI have failed to look at its applications outside of chatbots. She acknowledged the risks of startups working in the energy sector, but believes the US$1 trillion potential of markets such as those for batteries and carbon capture are worth the investing risk.
“We love big hills as long as there’s a big gigantic market and opportunity at the top,” she said.
Gomez-Bombarelli is aware how big these hills can be. He helped start a similar company to Orbital Materials in 2015, called Calculario, which used AI and quantum chemistry to speed up the discovery process for a range of new materials. It did not get enough traction and had to focus on the OLED industry.
“Maybe we didn’t make our case,” he said. “Or maybe the market wasn’t ready.”
Whether it is now is an open question, but there are encouraging signs. Computing certainly has improved. Newcomers might also have an easier time selling AI because would-be customers could more easily grasp the potential.
Gomez-Bombarelli said the pitch is relatively simple: “Look at ChatGPT. We can do the same thing for chemistry.”
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS