The subsidy plan is helpful
Following Vice President William Lai’s (賴清德) proposal to subsidize students at private universities, which was initially to provide about NT$25,000 per student per year, the Executive Yuan has also broadened subsidies to make high school and vocational high schools free as well. The subsidy, which is to take effect on Feb. 1 next year, has been raised to NT$35,000 per year for each student attending a private college or university in Taiwan.
While some have called the Executive Yuan’s annual tuition subsidy plan “splurging,” and a vote-buying act for the 2024 presidential election, I do not agree. Whether it is making high school and vocational high schools free or subsidizing private university tuition, these are measures to reduce the general public’s financial burden. Even Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) supports the policy.
As the sub-replacement fertility has become increasingly severe — almost reaching to the point of a national crisis — one of the major reasons that put couples off having children is the continuous rise in the cost of education. Tuition is now alarmingly expensive, especially with private schools. Now that the government has proposed to lend a hand, policymakers across the political spectrum should be in full support instead of throwing cold water on the policy.
Former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) once famously said “never forget that the world has many sufferers,” while Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) proposed to have full government subsidies for children aged five and younger for one of his campaign promises.
As the Executive Yuan passed the act that would provide a NT$35,000 subsidy to students enrolled in private universities and full subsidies for high school and vocational high school students, policymakers and the public should appreciate the government’s altruism — a measure with the manner of “suffer what the people suffer” as Han used to say — to help families reduce the cost of their children’s education.
I have never understood why the government has always placed more importance on public schools than private schools, providing more subsidies to the former than the latter. Why do students who go to private schools always have to pay a lot more while getting the same level of education as public school students? This has resulted in a rather paradoxical situation: Children who are born in richer families usually attend public universities, while children of less affluent families attend private universities, resulting in an ever widening gap and class differences. The Executive Yuan’s policy is now seeking to remedy this inequality to push for better social justice.
Although Lu is from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), she knows the needs of the general public. From a maternal point of view, she fully endorses the policy as she finds it beneficial to her “children” citizens. As the Executive Yuan has come up with such a decent policy to promote people’s welfare and happiness, she is urging it to keep the policy going, to benefit tens of thousands of students to not end up as a flash in the pan.
Hu Yen
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS