The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Tuesday said that it would continue to provide assistance to Palau for tourism and infrastructure, with the Pacific ally under pressure from China to break ties with Taiwan.
The importance to Taiwan, the US and other like-minded nations of good ties with Palau and keeping it free from Beijing’s influence is vital, as it is part of the second island chain, halfway between Guam and the Philippines — which are crucially important to strategic efforts to curtail Chinese expansionism in the Indo-Pacific region.
After Beijing built up Palau’s dependence on China for tourism, a vital component of its economy, it then stopped sending tourists to force Palau to switch recognition from Taipei to Beijing.
China Airlines has two direct flights per week between Taiwan and Palau, but, despite always being full, they cannot meet tourism needs.
Taipei should subsidize airlines to increase flights to Palau. It could partner with Japan and South Korea to help promote tourism there. If the flights are always full, there is clearly demand for travel to Palau, so promotional work should be straightforward.
There are other ways to help. For example, software companies could establish offices in Palau, and train and hire Palauan software engineers. The government could pay Taiwanese to work on infrastructure projects in Palau at no cost to the Palauan government.
The response of Palau’s leadership to Chinese pressure shows that money alone would not lure it into establishing ties with China, but it still has economic needs that must be met so Beijing cannot force Ngerulmud’s hand.
The US provides assistance through the Compact of Free Association, as well as through the Philippines-based office of the US Agency for International Development. Taiwan could cooperate with those agencies to help develop and fund infrastructure in Palau.
Taiwan must take the issue seriously, because Chinese economic and political influence go hand in hand, meaning Beijing might establish a police or military presence in Palau, as it has done in other countries.
The US is responsible for Palau’s defense and there has been talk of establishing a US military base there. If that happened, the navies of Taiwan and other countries could stop at ports there, assuming Palauans assented, which would also boost its economy.
Partners in the region have grown closer in the past few years due to shared concerns over Chinese expansionism. Australia in March announced plans to work with the US and the UK to upgrade its submarine fleet; the Philippines has allowed the US access to some of its bases; and on Sunday, the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier docked in Da Nang, Vietnam.
Agence France-Presse on Monday said that the port call was only the third by a US aircraft carrier to the nation since the end of the Vietnam War.
“The visit gives that message that Vietnam is continuing to balance against China by improving its security relationship with the US and with other outside powers,” University of New South Wales Canberra researcher Nguyen The Phuong told AFP.
Boosting partnerships and exchanges to counter Chinese expansionism is vital, so ties with Palau are important and calls for assistance must not be taken lightly. The relationship must be protected as regional powers seek to demonstrate unity in the face of Chinese aggression.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS