The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Tuesday said that it would continue to provide assistance to Palau for tourism and infrastructure, with the Pacific ally under pressure from China to break ties with Taiwan.
The importance to Taiwan, the US and other like-minded nations of good ties with Palau and keeping it free from Beijing’s influence is vital, as it is part of the second island chain, halfway between Guam and the Philippines — which are crucially important to strategic efforts to curtail Chinese expansionism in the Indo-Pacific region.
After Beijing built up Palau’s dependence on China for tourism, a vital component of its economy, it then stopped sending tourists to force Palau to switch recognition from Taipei to Beijing.
China Airlines has two direct flights per week between Taiwan and Palau, but, despite always being full, they cannot meet tourism needs.
Taipei should subsidize airlines to increase flights to Palau. It could partner with Japan and South Korea to help promote tourism there. If the flights are always full, there is clearly demand for travel to Palau, so promotional work should be straightforward.
There are other ways to help. For example, software companies could establish offices in Palau, and train and hire Palauan software engineers. The government could pay Taiwanese to work on infrastructure projects in Palau at no cost to the Palauan government.
The response of Palau’s leadership to Chinese pressure shows that money alone would not lure it into establishing ties with China, but it still has economic needs that must be met so Beijing cannot force Ngerulmud’s hand.
The US provides assistance through the Compact of Free Association, as well as through the Philippines-based office of the US Agency for International Development. Taiwan could cooperate with those agencies to help develop and fund infrastructure in Palau.
Taiwan must take the issue seriously, because Chinese economic and political influence go hand in hand, meaning Beijing might establish a police or military presence in Palau, as it has done in other countries.
The US is responsible for Palau’s defense and there has been talk of establishing a US military base there. If that happened, the navies of Taiwan and other countries could stop at ports there, assuming Palauans assented, which would also boost its economy.
Partners in the region have grown closer in the past few years due to shared concerns over Chinese expansionism. Australia in March announced plans to work with the US and the UK to upgrade its submarine fleet; the Philippines has allowed the US access to some of its bases; and on Sunday, the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier docked in Da Nang, Vietnam.
Agence France-Presse on Monday said that the port call was only the third by a US aircraft carrier to the nation since the end of the Vietnam War.
“The visit gives that message that Vietnam is continuing to balance against China by improving its security relationship with the US and with other outside powers,” University of New South Wales Canberra researcher Nguyen The Phuong told AFP.
Boosting partnerships and exchanges to counter Chinese expansionism is vital, so ties with Palau are important and calls for assistance must not be taken lightly. The relationship must be protected as regional powers seek to demonstrate unity in the face of Chinese aggression.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS