During a forum at National Taiwan University, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) called himself the first gongan (公安) to visit “Mainland China,” referring to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) term for “police.” He added that he opposes “Taiwan independence,” because the phrase “Taiwan independence” cannot be found in the Constitution of the Republic of China (ROC) and dared those who advocate Taiwan independence to go ahead and change the Constitution.
This ruffian way of talking is not new to Taiwanese. During his visit to China in March, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) held on to the ROC Constitution, a set of laws written with China’s territory in mind and yet imposed upon Taiwan. Singing the same tune as Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Ma has advocated pro-China ideas such as the so-called “1992 consensus,” the “one China” principle and “anti-Taiwan independence.” Hou parroted Ma by adopting a literal interpretation of the ROC Constitution and referring to himself as a gongan, an act that underscored his ignorance and hypocrisy.
Anyone familiar with the ROC Constitution will know that “Taiwan independence” is nowhere to be found in the Constitution, and neither is the word “Taiwan.” Neither would they find any article detailing national territory as covering Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu and Taiwan, and a population of 23 million people.
Article 4 stipulates that “the territory of the Republic of China according to its existing national boundaries shall not be altered.” By this logic, the PRC should not have “broken away” to become an independent nation either.
Ma, a former anti-Chinese Communist Party activist, went back on his word by opposing the term “Taiwan” or “ROC (Taiwan),” and dared anyone with a second opinion to change the ROC Constitution.
Hou tried to imitate Ma, but did it poorly when he “accidentally” advocated for “Taiwan independence” by claiming that the ROC has a population of 23 million and a territory composed of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.
By putting the ROC and Penghu, Kinmen, Taiwan and Matsu, as well as 23 million citizens in the same basket, Hou is supporting the idea that “the two sides across the Taiwan Strait should not be subordinate to each other,” an ideology that is labeled as “type B Taiwan independence,” namely the “two-state” theory proposed by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) in 1999, which characterized Taiwan and China as two different jurisdictions. Under this ideology, Hou’s ideology aligns with the Democratic Progressive Party’s stance that it is up to Taiwan’s 23 million citizens to decide its status as a sovereign state.
The Constitution should have been an up-to-date modern pact, not a series of anachronistic articles. The ROC Constitution is already a historical document, and it was written with China as its main territory in mind. In January 1949, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) sent a telegram to reprimand then-Taiwan provincial governor Chen Cheng (陳誠): “Taiwan’s legal status and sovereignty, before the Japan Peace Conference, were only a trusteeship of our country [China]. How could it be clearly stated as the last bastion of communist suppression and the basis for national rejuvenation?”
According to the Treaty of San Francisco, Japan renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. However, the treaty ceded the islands to no one, and neither did the ROC Constitution list Taiwan as its territory. Only the PRC Constitution “clearly claims” Taiwan as its territory. As Hou mixed up gongan for police, perhaps he is also mixing up his reading of the ROC Constitution.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Rita Wang
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into