Legislative Speaker You Si-kun (游錫?) is on Tuesday next week to set off from Yilan County’s Suao Township (蘇澳) on a direct flight to Japan’s Yonaguni Island to promote tourism between the two destinations.
However, You’s visit would not be covered live by news media to avoid geopolitical disputes. This raises a question: Yonaguni is about 160km from Taipei, so why would the trip cause controversy? The answer lies in the particularity of the Okinawa issue within the greater Taiwan Strait dispute.
Japan’s Kyodo news agency on June 9 reported that Okinawa Governor Yasuhiro Tamaki visited the Japanese Ministry of Defense with a petition, expressing his opposition to the deployment of long-range missiles in Okinawa Prefecture to prevent it from being involved in a possible war across the Taiwan Strait.
There are two shortcuts for the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy to enter the western Pacific: One is through the Bashi Channel at the south of Taiwan and the other is the Miyako Strait to the east of Taiwan.
What Tamaki opposes is a missile force that the Japan Self-Defense Force established on Ishigaki Island in March. The governor’s concern is understandable, as You’s planned visit to the hot spot would unavoidably highlight geographical conflicts.
News coverage of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) visit to the China National Archives of Publications and Culture early this month featured the Ming Dynasty manuscript Records of Envoys to Ryukyu (使琉球錄). While focusing on the role of the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in the manuscript, Xi pointed to the tributary history between the Chinese dynasty and the Ryukyu Kingdom. What was the purpose of this? Was it a threat or a hint?
Given that the PLA can come up with all sorts of excuses to legitimize its behavior, military competition with it has no end in sight.
Shih Ya-hsuan is an associate professor in National Kaohsiung Normal University’s Department of Geography.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of