You would think in the year 2023, we would all agree that a little bit of shade and water is a basic human right when it is 46.1°C outside. Texas seems to think otherwise.
Even as the state this month suffered through record heat that shows no sign of relenting, Texas Governor Greg Abbott this week signed a law rescinding a requirement that employers offer outdoor workers breaks for water and shade. The measure overrides long-standing laws in Austin and Dallas that provide outdoor workers breaks every four hours.
Apparently, these life-saving city ordinances were too much for local businesses.
“For too long, progressive municipal officials and agencies have made Texas small businesses jump through contradictory and confusing hoops when it comes to the current hodgepodge of onerous and burdensome regulations,” one of the bill’s Republican sponsors said in explaining its rationale.
Whatever the motivation, even in normal Texas summers, which are infamously hot and humid, taking away water and shade would be an egregious abuse of human rights. More than 53 workers have died from heat in Texas since 2010, according to a study by NPR and Columbia Journalism Investigations. The hotter the planet gets because of climate change, the more dangerously hot Texas will get. Summer had not even begun this year before temperatures rose to triple digits and stayed there.
In fact, Texas would be the US state most affected by continued warming, according to a recent First Street analysis. Fifteen Texas counties are likely to spend 90 or more days above 100°F (37.8°C) this year, according to First Street. By 2053, these counties could spend more than a third of the year in such miserable conditions.
One might assume, or at least hope, that employers in Texas appreciate the value of keeping their workers alive and out of the hospital and would not need to be told to keep them as hydrated and cool as possible. And maybe workers will band together to fight for their rights.
However, many of the laborers this new law will affect are migrants, who might feel easily replaceable and without recourse. Many of them also lack sick days and health coverage. Hispanics made up about a third of all US worker heat deaths since 2010, according to the NPR/Columbia study. For low-wage workers, hope is not a plan.
The president of the League of United Latin American Citizens National, an advocacy group, called the new Texas law a “barbaric and deliberate act of playing politics with lives, denying even the simplest measure of compassion to another living soul.” Sounds about right.
Outnumbered Democratic lawmakers in Texas have repeatedly failed to overcome Republican resistance to turning break requirements into state law.
However, they should not have to go it alone. After an outcry from state attorneys general, President Joe Biden in 2021 ordered the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to come up with an emergency plan to protect workers from heat.
However, OSHA takes seven years, on average, to write and approve such rules, the Government Accountability Office has estimated. Workers simply do not have that kind of time. Texas lawmakers might be reluctant to admit climate change exists, but they should at least repeal this cruel law before it takes effect on Sept. 1. If the state will not act, then the Biden administration must move with much more urgency to impose national standards. Lives are at stake.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. A former managing editor of Fortune.com, he ran the HuffPost’s business and technology coverage and was a reporter and editor for the Wall Street Journal.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the