A few days ago, the Wagner mercenary group trained its guns away from Ukraine and moved into Russia, initially pushing on to Moscow before changing course. Its stated intention of seeking revenge on Russia’s military leadership commanded the world’s attention over the weekend. Even though the situation was resolved before a major conflict broke out on Russian soil, and Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin agreed to retreat to Belarus, the potential repercussions of this apparent attempted coup continue to command attention the world over — not least from within China.
After all, there is a high degree of similarity between the internal political power structures consolidated by Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Both dictators have a firm grip on power, and during their respective periods in office have extended their hold on the reins of state; neither man has a designated or acknowledged successor waiting in the wings.
This extreme centralization of power means that as soon as the authority or security of the dictator is challenged, there is the potential for insurrection or a coup.
That is not to say it will happen this way. The abortive attempted coup by the Wagner Group serves to remind the international community that there are relatively few precedents that can be used as a basis for debate or preparedness for what might happen. That is, what would a Russia without Putin, or for that matter a China without Xi, look like?
Ironically, and precisely because Xi is a dictator with a firm grip on power, any discussion on this matter is very unlikely to be countenanced within China.
Putin’s travails — be they the military quagmire he has orchestrated in Ukraine, the international sanctions the invasion has brought on his head, or indeed the internal dissent the world is now seeing evidence of — are certainly being closely followed by Xi and weighing heavily on his mind. They are likely to give pause for thought in Beijing’s corridors of power about how it approaches the “Taiwan issue.”
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
RSS