Employers have been facing a serious talent shortage during the post-COVID-19 period, with the manufacturing and service industries calling for an urgent government response and demanding that they be allowed to hire more foreign workers. The Cabinet has set a goal of attracting up to 400,000 foreign workers by 2030 to address the labor shortage, while the Ministry of Labor is easing rules for hiring migrant workers in manufacturing, construction, agriculture and long-term care, with an estimated 28,000 people likely to be admitted under the new policy.
Companies in the industrial and service sectors reported about 216,000 job vacancies in the first half of this year, a Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) survey showed. Most serious was the shortage of 84,000 mid-level technical workers, which includes technicians and associate professionals, craft and trade workers, as well as plant and machine operators. They accounted for about 39 percent of the vacancies, followed by openings for 51,000 professional personnel, and 41,000 service and sales staff.
The shortage of mid-level technical workers has persisted for a long time, but the number of job openings for service, shop and sales personnel reached the highest level in five years at about 19 percent of total vacancies. The DGBAS attributed the rise to people resuming consumption activity after the COVID-19 pandemic, boosting demand for service staff.
Nevertheless, it is the chronic shortage of mid-level technical workers that poses a critical problem to the nation’s long-term development, socially and economically. These skilled workers are vital to technology industries such as semiconductors and non-technology industries such as machinery making, the National Development Council says.
While the nation’s low birthrate is a major factor in the overall drop in the working population, the persistent decline in the number of vocational students in the past few years has contributed to the shortage of mid-level technical workers. The problem did not appear overnight. It reflects a long-term situation in which society values academic credentials over practical skills, while students prefer to attend universities and colleges rather than vocational schools.
The government has in the past few years implemented measures to retain skilled foreign workers after they complete their contracts. The continued retention and employment of experienced foreign workers can greatly reduce the time and cost of cultivating new workers. It can also prevent such workers from being poached by other countries and territories facing shrinking labor pools, such as China, Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea.
The “Long-term Retention of Skilled Foreign Workers Program” launched by the Ministry of Labor last year is aimed at allowing employers to retain foreign workers who have worked in Taiwan for at least six years. The program also provides opportunities for foreign workers to change their immigration status to “intermediate-skilled personnel,” which sets no limit on their work duration, while allowing them to apply for permanent residency after working for five years.
Demand for mid-level technical workers from local industries remains high, and the government must streamline the application process for employers to retain eligible workers. At the same time, it should promote vocational education and improve vocational schools, make vocational licenses and certifications more valuable, and promote the value of professional skills in society.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS