Looking at this year’s presidential and legislative nomination process, the national development planning of the candidates and their pan-blue, green and white camps can be seen.
Within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), there has been a dispute over its nomination mechanism, as Hon Hai Group founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) again sought the party’s presidential nomination. With a basic consensus that the party must select the most suitable candidate, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) nominated New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), a decision based on opinion polls.
Although the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the main party in the pan-white camp, was expected to ally with the KMT, the rise of pan-blue camp support was seen as unfavorable to the TPP, which has gradually been marginalized. A TVBS poll released last month said that support for the KMT, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the TPP was 23, 22 and 12 percent respectively.
The DPP, even with great resources, has its burdens. Since Vice President and DPP Chairman William Lai (賴清德) launched his presidential campaign without challenge, he has used traditional media, social media and YouTube to interact with young people on issues concerning them, such as their livelihoods, education, the economy and transportation, while also proposing possible solutions. This has obviously had a positive effect on Lai’s campaign.
A Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation poll released this month showed the DPP leading with a 24.6 percent approval rating, while the TPP’s rating rose greatly to 22.2 percent, overtaking the KMT, which fell to 20.4 percent.
Another TVBS poll, also conducted this month, showed that support for TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) surged 10 percent to 33 percent, followed by Lai at 30 percent, while Hou dropped to third at 23 percent. A surprise surge such as that by the TPP and its candidate is rarely seen, and the phenomenon deserves attention.
The TPP’s strategy is to uphold the banner of a “coalition government” after standing firmly in second place, in an attempt to stimulate a “dump-save effect,” in which voters ditch their preferred candidate to strategically cast their ballot for another to prevent a disliked party from winning.
The TPP believes that since there is a “ceiling” to the DPP’s growth, if the opposition camp can integrate light-green voters as well as medium to dark-blue voters, it might be able to achieve its ultimate goal of gaining power. This strategy has become the focus of many political watchers.
To achieve this, the TPP has been adopting a “two-handed strategy,” attacking the KMT to split the pan-blue camp, while attracting votes from the pan-green camp. The strategy has already yielded short-term results.
However, smart voters are also likely to be watching the TPP’s internal conflicts and Ko’s leadership style. Many problems occurred during his terms as Taipei mayor, such as administrative flaws by political appointees and corruption scandals, his autocratic leadership style and even sexual harassment allegations coming to light amid Taiwan’s #MeToo movement. Such problems are still fresh in the electorate’s mind.
Through direct elections, Taiwanese can be aware of facts and values that they are used to, but easily ignore, and such values of an open and diverse democratic society are exactly what China should learn.
Pan Wei-yiu is the secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS