Looking at this year’s presidential and legislative nomination process, the national development planning of the candidates and their pan-blue, green and white camps can be seen.
Within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), there has been a dispute over its nomination mechanism, as Hon Hai Group founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) again sought the party’s presidential nomination. With a basic consensus that the party must select the most suitable candidate, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) nominated New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), a decision based on opinion polls.
Although the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the main party in the pan-white camp, was expected to ally with the KMT, the rise of pan-blue camp support was seen as unfavorable to the TPP, which has gradually been marginalized. A TVBS poll released last month said that support for the KMT, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the TPP was 23, 22 and 12 percent respectively.
The DPP, even with great resources, has its burdens. Since Vice President and DPP Chairman William Lai (賴清德) launched his presidential campaign without challenge, he has used traditional media, social media and YouTube to interact with young people on issues concerning them, such as their livelihoods, education, the economy and transportation, while also proposing possible solutions. This has obviously had a positive effect on Lai’s campaign.
A Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation poll released this month showed the DPP leading with a 24.6 percent approval rating, while the TPP’s rating rose greatly to 22.2 percent, overtaking the KMT, which fell to 20.4 percent.
Another TVBS poll, also conducted this month, showed that support for TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) surged 10 percent to 33 percent, followed by Lai at 30 percent, while Hou dropped to third at 23 percent. A surprise surge such as that by the TPP and its candidate is rarely seen, and the phenomenon deserves attention.
The TPP’s strategy is to uphold the banner of a “coalition government” after standing firmly in second place, in an attempt to stimulate a “dump-save effect,” in which voters ditch their preferred candidate to strategically cast their ballot for another to prevent a disliked party from winning.
The TPP believes that since there is a “ceiling” to the DPP’s growth, if the opposition camp can integrate light-green voters as well as medium to dark-blue voters, it might be able to achieve its ultimate goal of gaining power. This strategy has become the focus of many political watchers.
To achieve this, the TPP has been adopting a “two-handed strategy,” attacking the KMT to split the pan-blue camp, while attracting votes from the pan-green camp. The strategy has already yielded short-term results.
However, smart voters are also likely to be watching the TPP’s internal conflicts and Ko’s leadership style. Many problems occurred during his terms as Taipei mayor, such as administrative flaws by political appointees and corruption scandals, his autocratic leadership style and even sexual harassment allegations coming to light amid Taiwan’s #MeToo movement. Such problems are still fresh in the electorate’s mind.
Through direct elections, Taiwanese can be aware of facts and values that they are used to, but easily ignore, and such values of an open and diverse democratic society are exactly what China should learn.
Pan Wei-yiu is the secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS