Looking at this year’s presidential and legislative nomination process, the national development planning of the candidates and their pan-blue, green and white camps can be seen.
Within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), there has been a dispute over its nomination mechanism, as Hon Hai Group founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) again sought the party’s presidential nomination. With a basic consensus that the party must select the most suitable candidate, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) nominated New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), a decision based on opinion polls.
Although the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the main party in the pan-white camp, was expected to ally with the KMT, the rise of pan-blue camp support was seen as unfavorable to the TPP, which has gradually been marginalized. A TVBS poll released last month said that support for the KMT, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the TPP was 23, 22 and 12 percent respectively.
The DPP, even with great resources, has its burdens. Since Vice President and DPP Chairman William Lai (賴清德) launched his presidential campaign without challenge, he has used traditional media, social media and YouTube to interact with young people on issues concerning them, such as their livelihoods, education, the economy and transportation, while also proposing possible solutions. This has obviously had a positive effect on Lai’s campaign.
A Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation poll released this month showed the DPP leading with a 24.6 percent approval rating, while the TPP’s rating rose greatly to 22.2 percent, overtaking the KMT, which fell to 20.4 percent.
Another TVBS poll, also conducted this month, showed that support for TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) surged 10 percent to 33 percent, followed by Lai at 30 percent, while Hou dropped to third at 23 percent. A surprise surge such as that by the TPP and its candidate is rarely seen, and the phenomenon deserves attention.
The TPP’s strategy is to uphold the banner of a “coalition government” after standing firmly in second place, in an attempt to stimulate a “dump-save effect,” in which voters ditch their preferred candidate to strategically cast their ballot for another to prevent a disliked party from winning.
The TPP believes that since there is a “ceiling” to the DPP’s growth, if the opposition camp can integrate light-green voters as well as medium to dark-blue voters, it might be able to achieve its ultimate goal of gaining power. This strategy has become the focus of many political watchers.
To achieve this, the TPP has been adopting a “two-handed strategy,” attacking the KMT to split the pan-blue camp, while attracting votes from the pan-green camp. The strategy has already yielded short-term results.
However, smart voters are also likely to be watching the TPP’s internal conflicts and Ko’s leadership style. Many problems occurred during his terms as Taipei mayor, such as administrative flaws by political appointees and corruption scandals, his autocratic leadership style and even sexual harassment allegations coming to light amid Taiwan’s #MeToo movement. Such problems are still fresh in the electorate’s mind.
Through direct elections, Taiwanese can be aware of facts and values that they are used to, but easily ignore, and such values of an open and diverse democratic society are exactly what China should learn.
Pan Wei-yiu is the secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS