During a ceremony at Chaoyang University of Technology’s summer volunteers’ camp in Taichung on Tuesday, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, said that the government would subsidize students at private universities to cover “at least half” of the gap between the tuition fees of public and private universities, which is estimated to be about NT$25,000 per year.
The subsidies are to be implemented from the second semester of the 2023-2024 academic year and approximately 590,000 students at private universities are expected to benefit.
For most students at private institutions, this was welcome news, but to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the proposed measure was nothing but the DPP pandering to voters.
When asked about the policy, Hou told reporters it was clearly a political ploy, as the DPP, despite having been in office for the past eight years, suddenly thought to address the private college tuition gap right before the January presidential election.
He asked whether the policy would be retroactive to cover people who graduated from a private college and are paying student loans.
Splurging is not the solution, he added.
A better solution would be to facilitate stronger ties between universities and industry, which would help new graduates find jobs, and promote increasing salaries, Hou said.
When asked if the DPP is using state resources to help Lai with his campaign, Hou said he was afraid this was the case.
As the subsidies would come from state coffers, it is highly doubtful that the policy would provide the substantial benefit for private institutions that Lai believes, Hou said.
However, Hou’s “splurging” comment reveals that he is not aware of the economic burden most students at private colleges face, while Lai has taken to heart students’ interests and the heavy burden they face after graduation.
The high cost of private tuition has been an issue for a long time and the government has been looking out for students’ interests by putting the brakes on demands by private universities to increase tuition fees.
Consequently, as the government’s finances are healthy enough to offer subsidy programs, it is seizing the chance to facilitate social justice, an act that any national leader would seek to do.
Unsympathetic to the plight of private college students by loftily calling the policy “splurging,” Hou’s remark exposes him as a narrow-minded candidate with limited understanding of issues of higher education and one who does not have the magnanimity to appreciate his rival’s policies.
Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) followed up on Lai’s remarks at an event at the Freeway Bureau’s traffic control center in Taipei on Thursday, when he said that the Executive Yuan is proposing three supplementary measures to broaden subsidies for college tuition, make high-school and vocational high-schools free, and extend tuition loans to bolster education in Taiwan.
As tuition at private universities and colleges is prohibitively expensive for many Taiwanese aspiring to get the education they want, the subsidies would level the playing field and increase fairness in education opportunities.
This is a concrete plan to implement the spirit stipulated in the Educational Fundamental Act (教育基本法) and, if possible, to benefit students at experimental education institutions.
Surely Hou would not have the heart to say “nay” to these proposals?
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS