During a ceremony at Chaoyang University of Technology’s summer volunteers’ camp in Taichung on Tuesday, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, said that the government would subsidize students at private universities to cover “at least half” of the gap between the tuition fees of public and private universities, which is estimated to be about NT$25,000 per year.
The subsidies are to be implemented from the second semester of the 2023-2024 academic year and approximately 590,000 students at private universities are expected to benefit.
For most students at private institutions, this was welcome news, but to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the proposed measure was nothing but the DPP pandering to voters.
When asked about the policy, Hou told reporters it was clearly a political ploy, as the DPP, despite having been in office for the past eight years, suddenly thought to address the private college tuition gap right before the January presidential election.
He asked whether the policy would be retroactive to cover people who graduated from a private college and are paying student loans.
Splurging is not the solution, he added.
A better solution would be to facilitate stronger ties between universities and industry, which would help new graduates find jobs, and promote increasing salaries, Hou said.
When asked if the DPP is using state resources to help Lai with his campaign, Hou said he was afraid this was the case.
As the subsidies would come from state coffers, it is highly doubtful that the policy would provide the substantial benefit for private institutions that Lai believes, Hou said.
However, Hou’s “splurging” comment reveals that he is not aware of the economic burden most students at private colleges face, while Lai has taken to heart students’ interests and the heavy burden they face after graduation.
The high cost of private tuition has been an issue for a long time and the government has been looking out for students’ interests by putting the brakes on demands by private universities to increase tuition fees.
Consequently, as the government’s finances are healthy enough to offer subsidy programs, it is seizing the chance to facilitate social justice, an act that any national leader would seek to do.
Unsympathetic to the plight of private college students by loftily calling the policy “splurging,” Hou’s remark exposes him as a narrow-minded candidate with limited understanding of issues of higher education and one who does not have the magnanimity to appreciate his rival’s policies.
Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) followed up on Lai’s remarks at an event at the Freeway Bureau’s traffic control center in Taipei on Thursday, when he said that the Executive Yuan is proposing three supplementary measures to broaden subsidies for college tuition, make high-school and vocational high-schools free, and extend tuition loans to bolster education in Taiwan.
As tuition at private universities and colleges is prohibitively expensive for many Taiwanese aspiring to get the education they want, the subsidies would level the playing field and increase fairness in education opportunities.
This is a concrete plan to implement the spirit stipulated in the Educational Fundamental Act (教育基本法) and, if possible, to benefit students at experimental education institutions.
Surely Hou would not have the heart to say “nay” to these proposals?
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS