The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is deeply mired in internal discord and is inconsistent on national policies. All it can do is to hold high the so-called “peace” banner — but without any substantive idea about what peace really is, or how to achieve it. It contents itself with fighting those who offer a different vision, saying that a vote for Vice President William Lai (賴清德) — the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential candidate who has described himself as a “pragmatic worker for Taiwan’s independence” — would be tantamount to seeking war. This is a pure, cynical manipulation of the facts for the sake of elections.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine offers Taiwanese a glimpse into how voting in the presidential election could increase or decrease the probability of war.
With the benefit of hindsight, the world knows that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has stepped up to the plate in his robust defense of Ukraine. However, during the 2019 Ukrainian presidential campaign, few outside of Ukraine knew Zelenskiy, only that he was running against an incumbent — Petro Poroshenko, a Ukrainian nationalist against Russia. Zelenskiy ended up defeating Poroshenko.
Poroshenko was defeated because of his poor performance in office, which was a domestic issue. The result of the election was simply the Ukrainians expressing their desire for political reform through the ballot box. Nevertheless, it inadvertently sent the wrong message to Russia.
When Russian President Vladimir Putin saw the anti-Russia Poroshenko lose the election to Zelenskiy, who grew up speaking Russian, he misread it as meaning Zelenskiy would be pro-Russia. Putin interpreted the election results as Ukrainians’ desire to identify with Russia, and that they would welcome a Russian invasion.
Putin believed that Moscow would face little resistance when it invaded Ukraine, allowing it to seize the country before the West intervenes. The risk of failure appeared to be very low.
Europe and the US got it wrong, too. At the beginning of the war, Germany believed that Ukraine would lose, and even hoped that this would happen quickly, so the war would end. The US offered to evacuate Zelenskiy from Kyiv, which showed that Washington also believed Ukraine would not be able to protect the capital. Zelenskiy refused, saying that Ukraine needed military support, not an airplane seat. He stayed in Ukraine, which under his leadership has frustrated the Russian army in numerous confrontations, and Ukraine remains undefeated.
If Putin had known that Ukraine would be so determined to resist an invasion, he would not have launched the war. Zelenskiy’s election sent out the wrong message to Putin, and although Zelenskiy was not to blame, it was the key reason behind the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war.
If Taiwanese hope to cast a vote to prevent war, they should have a clear idea about whom to vote for — that is, the candidate whose victory would convey the correct message to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The outcome of the election should let Xi know that Taiwanese are determined to resist China and are prepared for war. If Xi is reckless and gives the order for war, China would be dragged into a quagmire, just as Putin has been. This should give him pause for thought.
If the result of the presidential election gives Xi reason to believe that Taiwanese are too timid to fight, or even welcome annexation by China, it would be very bad for Taiwan. Xi might be given cause to believe that invading Taiwan would be very easy, and that the People’s Liberation Army would not encounter any resistance, and would even be welcomed, allowing it to seize Taiwan before the US has had a chance to intervene.
Only by voting for the candidate that China dislikes the most can the message “Taiwanese will resist to the end” be truly conveyed to Xi, and deter him from provoking war. If Taiwanese are terrified of the prospect of war, it is clear whom they should vote for.
Tommy Lin is director of Wu Fu Eye Clinic and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS