Broken promises, missed opportunities and a failure to see the bigger picture: That is the story of the West’s approach to developing countries in recent years. Money to help with climate breakdown has been pledged, but not delivered. Vaccines have been hoarded. Aid budgets have been cut.
From any perspective — be it geopolitical, economic, humanitarian or ecological — the indifference to what is happening elsewhere is disastrous.
If the West wants to counter Beijing’s influence in Africa, to secure the raw materials and metals it needs for its green industrial revolution, to prevent a debt crisis and to have any hope of tackling global heating, it needs to sharpen up its act fast.
Illustration: Yusha
No question, life in developed countries has been tough recently. High inflation has eroded living standards. Rising interest rates have made it harder for households and governments to service their debts. Money is tight. Everybody gets that.
However, tough though life is in the West, it is a lot tougher in the developing and emerging world. As the World Bank made clear in its update on the global economy last week, poor countries are the biggest losers from the combined effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the anti-inflationary measures taken by the US Federal Reserve and other Western central banks.
With good reason, developing countries view the protectionist elements of US President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, and Europe’s proposed response to it, with concern. They want to be part of the green industrial revolution, not excluded from it by self-serving policy decisions in Washington and Brussels.
While Western countries have been preoccupied with their own problems, the situation in the Global South has been growing progressively darker.
The UN goal of eradicating extreme poverty by 2030 would be comfortably missed, the number of extreme weather events is increasing and the number of countries either in debt distress or on the verge of it is rising.
To make matters worse, the global financial system is broken. Poor countries that borrowed in US dollars are being punished, because US interest rates are going up. Money from the World Bank was supposed to be the catalyst for a wave of private-sector capital to finance clean energy in Africa, but it is not arriving. A new system designed to speed up debt relief is unfit for purpose.
All of which makes French President Emmanuel Macron’s development finance summit in Paris this week a much bigger deal than the average run-of-the-mill talkfest.
Or it will be, if the leaders of the developed world bother to show up. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz plans to be there, but he is the only other G7 leader on the list of attendees.
Fair play to Macron. The French president realizes that poor countries need more financial resources if they are to grow sustainably and that there needs to be reform of the global financial system for this to happen.
It is not hard to sketch out what needs to be done. For a start, there is some low-hanging fruit to be picked. In 2009, developed countries promised they would provide US$100 billion a year by 2020 to help poor countries reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prepare for the effects of global heating. With one last push, the pledge could be met this year.
Likewise, during the height of the pandemic, the IMF issued a US$650 billion tranche of special drawing rights (SDRs) — essentially a form of free money for member countries. Rich countries did not need the boost to their reserves provided by SDRs, even though they were the main beneficiaries, and were urged by the IMF to recycle US$100 billion to help poor countries. Again, the target could be hit with one last push.
Next, the World Bank needs an injection of fresh capital so that it can lend more to developing countries. Under its previous president, David Malpass, the bank was overly cautious. The new man at the helm, World Bank president Ajay Banga, needs to be a lot more ambitious.
It is also vital that money from the World Bank and other multilateral lenders stimulates private investment in the green energy transition.
This is not happening, primarily because developing countries are seen as too risky, with the volatility of exchange rates potentially wiping out any returns on investment. To counter this risk, Avinash Persaud, adviser to Barbadian Prime Minister Mia Mottley, has proposed a new foreign exchange guarantee agency. This would pool risks, reduce the cost of hedging and make projects to tackle the climate crisis more attractive to the private sector.
There was a time when a development finance summit would have been held in London, not Paris. That is because former UK prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown took a real interest in development, and put pressure on other Western leaders to take global poverty seriously. Yet the current signs are that British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will not even attend Macron’s summit, but will send British Minister of State for Development and Africa Andrew Mitchell instead.
Mitchell is one of the good guys. He cares about development and is well-regarded by non-governmental organizations.
However, Sunak should make time to support Macron for two reasons. The first is tactical. Sunak is planning a global summit on artificial intelligence safety in London in the autumn, but he is fooling himself if he thinks other leaders will turn up to his event if he cannot be bothered to attend theirs.
The second, and much more important, reason is that Macron is trying to do the right things. If he does not get the full backing of countries such as Britain, his summit would be another missed opportunity.
Larry Elliott is the Guardian’s economics editor.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS