Recently, numerous sexual harassment and assault incidents have been exposed in Taiwan. The alledged offenders include public figures, elected representatives and school teachers at all levels.
Sexual harassment is different from sexual assault. In 2009, Taiwan enacted the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act (性騷擾防治法).
However, Article 13 of the act only states that a sexual harassment victim “can also propose a complaint against the defendant to the defendant’s organization, troop, school, institution, employer, or to the municipal and county (city) competent authorities where the defendant ... sets his or her domicile.”
In addition, the section on “compulsory indecency” in the Criminal Code overlaps with the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act.
Furthermore, if the victims are underage minors, they are protected by Article 97 of the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法). For these reasons, sexual harassment laws are difficult to enforce.
Therefore, the Legislative Yuan should amend these laws promptly.
First, it should clearly define sexual assault, sexual harassment and indecency.
Second, it should distinguish between adults and minors based on the ages of the victims. If such cases occur on campus, due to student age differences, the legality of the schools’ gender equality committee needs to be reviewed to avoid a situation where the criminal or civil judgement is not in line with the resolution of a school committee.
Besides, if a school’s gender equality committee found a teacher guilty of sexual harassment or sexual bullying, it would terminate the teacher’s employment and prohibit them from being hired as a teacher for life. The resolution is life-changing.
However, if later the teacher, after losing their job, were to be found not guilty in a criminal or civil lawsuit, the school would have to confront long-term legal disputes inimical to its operation.
If the legislature cannot address these problems, extending the statute of limitations for sexual harassment from one year to two years might be an alternative.
Liu Yung-chien is an educator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS