Major economies from the US to China to Japan have been growing at different rates this year, as monetary policies and economic growth begin to diverge in the post-COVID-19 era.
This contrasts with last year, when developed economies converged in their willingness to aggressively raise interest rates to prevent inflation from running wild, despite the threat of cooling economic growth.
However, there appears to be a widening divergence in central banks’ resolve to overtighten this year, as some are reconsidering the rate hike cycle’s effects on economic growth and employment, while others remain on the lookout for rising inflation.
The division reflects the material differences in economic outcomes across borders and also shows that global central banks’ synchronized interest rate hikes have come to an end.
Taiwan’s central bank maintained its discount rate at 1.875 percent following its quarterly board meeting on Thursday last week, which was in line with market expectations. The pause marks a shift in the bank’s monetary policy after five consecutive rate hikes totaling 75 basis points since March last year.
The move came hours after the US Federal Reserve kept the target range of its Fed funds rate unchanged at 5 to 5.25 percent. It was the first pause in the US central bank’s current rate hike cycle after having raised rates by 500 basis points in 10 policy-setting meetings since March last year.
However, later on Thursday, the European Central Bank raised its three key interest rates by 25 basis points, bringing them to the highest levels in two decades, while signaling more rate increases ahead.
Despite mixed actions by the Fed and the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan unsurprisingly kept its ultra-low interest rates unchanged on Friday in a move that underlines the bank’s long-term policy of trying to nurture sustainable and stable inflation.
Meanwhile, the central banks of Australia and Canada raised their policy rates by 25 basis points at their monetary policy meetings on June 6 and June 7 respectively, as inflation remained sticky.
However, the People’s Bank of China cut its medium-term lending facility rate — the interest for one-year loans to financial institutions — by 10 basis points to 2.65 percent on Thursday following a 10 basis-point reduction in the key seven-day reverse repo rate to 1.9 percent on Tuesday, after fresh data showed China’s post-COVID-19 recovery was running out of steam.
By absolute value, the magnitude of global interest rate hikes since last year is lower than what it was before the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, but the pace of rate hikes in the past one-and-a-half years has been faster than expected, as monetary policymakers tried to make up for their inflation misjudgement.
The market’s focus has turned to economic growth and whether central banks are prepared to eventually halt rate hikes, or even start to cut rates.
For Taiwan’s central bank, weaker-than-expected GDP data and moderating inflationary pressure are likely to discourage policymakers from implementing further rate hikes by the end of this year, or even in the first half of next year. This could be the beginning of an extended rate pause period, as the likelihood of rate cuts is extremely low in the near term, considering the outlook for inflation in the service sector, which has risen due to increased demand following the end of most COVID-19 restrictions, labor shortages and rising labor costs.
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from