At the end of last month, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed the Anti-Homosexuality Act, a law that institutionalizes the persecution of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI+) people and, more broadly, promotes a culture of hate.
The bill is one of the world’s harshest anti-LGBTQI+ laws. It criminalizes consensual same-sex relations and imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment for anyone who engages in gay sex, and the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” — defined as homosexual acts involving individuals infected with HIV, children or disabled people.
Equally worrying is the broad and vague provision that outlaws the “promotion of homosexuality” and mandates a prison term of up to 20 years for offenders.
Beyond being punitive, this anti-gay legislation infringes on Ugandans’ constitutional rights, including the right to privacy, freedom from discrimination and from cruel and degrading treatment, and the presumption of innocence.
By criminalizing the promotion of homosexuality, the Anti-Homosexuality Act shuts down debate, limits access to HIV-related services, and curtails freedom of expression, thought, assembly and association.
The bill breaches several regional and international human rights treaties to which Uganda is a party. These include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, both of which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, which the UN Human Rights Committee and courts have interpreted to include sexual orientation.
The devastating effect of this draconian law on LGBTQI+ people in Uganda cannot be overstated. The Ugandan government has effectively sanctioned mob justice, and people fear that expressing their sexuality or gender identity could put them at risk of violence.
The introduction of the bill to parliament in early March precipitated a rise in anti-gay human rights violations. From March 21 and April 20, the Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum documented 59 unlawful arrests, evictions and assaults targeting LGBTQI+ people.
Codifying discrimination is by no means an aberration in Uganda, where the LGBTQI+ population has long contended with societal homophobia and the absence of legal protections.
The country’s first anti-gay legislation was inherited from British colonialists. Codified in the 1950 Penal Code, and later strengthened in the 1990s, the law imposes severe punishments for same-sex acts, categorizing them as “against the order of nature.”
The push for tougher legislation has intensified over the past decade. In December 2013, Uganda’s parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2014, with punishments for homosexual behavior almost as severe as in last year’s version.
However, the Ugandan Court of Appeal later struck it down, on the grounds that the parliament was inquorate at the time of the vote. Since then, populist lawmakers have repeatedly introduced similar bills.
Funded by Western right-wing and religious groups, these self-serving Ugandan politicians employ incendiary homophobic rhetoric under the guise of defending “African values” against what they perceive as the West’s imposition of LGBTQI+ rights.
However, they fail to recognize that homophobia is a legacy of Western colonialism.
The role of Christian fundamentalist groups in exporting hate and homophobia to Africa was on full display at a recent interparliamentary conference on family values held in Kampala.
Family Watch International, an Arizona-based organization deemed an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, helped fund and organize the event, which was attended by religious leaders, youth activists and members of parliament from more than 20 African countries. The attendees called on their governments to criminalize homosexuality and same-sex unions, and to enact stricter penalties for engaging in gay sex, further marginalizing and stigmatizing LGBTQI+ people and fostering an environment of fear and hostility.
For all the talk of an anti-African cultural agenda, signing the Anti-Homosexuality Act into law is a distraction from issues such as rising inflation, an under-resourced health system and increased insecurity.
The Ugandan government has historically scapegoated sexual minorities to deflect public criticism of its failed policies and to consolidate support. By targeting a marginalized group for vilification, the government seeks to create a common enemy and manipulate pre-existing biases to advance its political interests.
However, despite the escalating threats, the fight for LGBTQI+ rights in Uganda continues. Human rights advocates in the country have initiated legal proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of the bill. The outcome remains uncertain, but there is hope that, like its predecessor in 2014, the new law might not survive.
The LGBTQI+ community and advocates for the rights of sexual minorities in Uganda must be commended for their unwavering resilience and determination.
However, achieving a truly inclusive society requires Ugandans to reject discriminatory ideology and embrace the principles enshrined in the country’s constitution: equality, dignity, inclusion and tolerance. Only a shared commitment to equality and justice can ensure freedom for all.
Sarah Kihika Kasande, a human rights lawyer, is head of the International Center for Transitional Justice’s Uganda office and cofounder of Chapter Four Uganda, a human rights organization focused on protecting civil liberties.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s