At the end of last month, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed the Anti-Homosexuality Act, a law that institutionalizes the persecution of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI+) people and, more broadly, promotes a culture of hate.
The bill is one of the world’s harshest anti-LGBTQI+ laws. It criminalizes consensual same-sex relations and imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment for anyone who engages in gay sex, and the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” — defined as homosexual acts involving individuals infected with HIV, children or disabled people.
Equally worrying is the broad and vague provision that outlaws the “promotion of homosexuality” and mandates a prison term of up to 20 years for offenders.
Beyond being punitive, this anti-gay legislation infringes on Ugandans’ constitutional rights, including the right to privacy, freedom from discrimination and from cruel and degrading treatment, and the presumption of innocence.
By criminalizing the promotion of homosexuality, the Anti-Homosexuality Act shuts down debate, limits access to HIV-related services, and curtails freedom of expression, thought, assembly and association.
The bill breaches several regional and international human rights treaties to which Uganda is a party. These include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, both of which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, which the UN Human Rights Committee and courts have interpreted to include sexual orientation.
The devastating effect of this draconian law on LGBTQI+ people in Uganda cannot be overstated. The Ugandan government has effectively sanctioned mob justice, and people fear that expressing their sexuality or gender identity could put them at risk of violence.
The introduction of the bill to parliament in early March precipitated a rise in anti-gay human rights violations. From March 21 and April 20, the Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum documented 59 unlawful arrests, evictions and assaults targeting LGBTQI+ people.
Codifying discrimination is by no means an aberration in Uganda, where the LGBTQI+ population has long contended with societal homophobia and the absence of legal protections.
The country’s first anti-gay legislation was inherited from British colonialists. Codified in the 1950 Penal Code, and later strengthened in the 1990s, the law imposes severe punishments for same-sex acts, categorizing them as “against the order of nature.”
The push for tougher legislation has intensified over the past decade. In December 2013, Uganda’s parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2014, with punishments for homosexual behavior almost as severe as in last year’s version.
However, the Ugandan Court of Appeal later struck it down, on the grounds that the parliament was inquorate at the time of the vote. Since then, populist lawmakers have repeatedly introduced similar bills.
Funded by Western right-wing and religious groups, these self-serving Ugandan politicians employ incendiary homophobic rhetoric under the guise of defending “African values” against what they perceive as the West’s imposition of LGBTQI+ rights.
However, they fail to recognize that homophobia is a legacy of Western colonialism.
The role of Christian fundamentalist groups in exporting hate and homophobia to Africa was on full display at a recent interparliamentary conference on family values held in Kampala.
Family Watch International, an Arizona-based organization deemed an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, helped fund and organize the event, which was attended by religious leaders, youth activists and members of parliament from more than 20 African countries. The attendees called on their governments to criminalize homosexuality and same-sex unions, and to enact stricter penalties for engaging in gay sex, further marginalizing and stigmatizing LGBTQI+ people and fostering an environment of fear and hostility.
For all the talk of an anti-African cultural agenda, signing the Anti-Homosexuality Act into law is a distraction from issues such as rising inflation, an under-resourced health system and increased insecurity.
The Ugandan government has historically scapegoated sexual minorities to deflect public criticism of its failed policies and to consolidate support. By targeting a marginalized group for vilification, the government seeks to create a common enemy and manipulate pre-existing biases to advance its political interests.
However, despite the escalating threats, the fight for LGBTQI+ rights in Uganda continues. Human rights advocates in the country have initiated legal proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of the bill. The outcome remains uncertain, but there is hope that, like its predecessor in 2014, the new law might not survive.
The LGBTQI+ community and advocates for the rights of sexual minorities in Uganda must be commended for their unwavering resilience and determination.
However, achieving a truly inclusive society requires Ugandans to reject discriminatory ideology and embrace the principles enshrined in the country’s constitution: equality, dignity, inclusion and tolerance. Only a shared commitment to equality and justice can ensure freedom for all.
Sarah Kihika Kasande, a human rights lawyer, is head of the International Center for Transitional Justice’s Uganda office and cofounder of Chapter Four Uganda, a human rights organization focused on protecting civil liberties.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS